Schacter D L
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11113-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11113.
Recent evidence from cognitive science and neuroscience indicates that brain-damaged patients and normal subjects can exhibit nonconscious or implicit knowledge of stimuli that they fail to recollect consciously or perceive explicitly. Dissociations between implicit and explicit knowledge, which have been observed across a variety of domains, tasks, and materials, raise fundamental questions about the nature of perception, memory, and consciousness. This article provides a selective review of relevant evidence and considers such phenomena as priming and implicit memory in amnesic patients and normal subjects, perception without awareness and "blindsight" in patients with damage to visual cortex, and nonconscious recognition of familiar faces in patients with facial-recognition deficits (prosopagnosia). A variety of theoretical approaches to implicit/explicit dissociations are considered. One view is that all of the various dissociations can be attributed to disruption or disconnection of a common mechanism underlying conscious experience; an alternative possibility is that each dissociation requires a separate explanation in terms of domain-specific processes and systems. More generally, it is concluded that rather than reflecting the operation of affectively charged unconscious processes of the kind invoked by psychodynamic or Freudian theorists, dissociations between implicit and explicit knowledge are a natural consequence of the ordinary computations of the brain.
认知科学和神经科学的最新证据表明,脑损伤患者和正常受试者对于未能有意识回忆或明确感知的刺激,可以表现出非意识或内隐知识。在各种领域、任务和材料中都观察到了内隐知识和外显知识之间的分离,这引发了关于感知、记忆和意识本质的基本问题。本文对相关证据进行了选择性综述,并探讨了诸如失忆症患者和正常受试者中的启动效应和内隐记忆、视觉皮层受损患者的无意识感知和“盲视”,以及面部识别缺陷(面孔失认症)患者对熟悉面孔的非意识识别等现象。文中还考虑了多种关于内隐/外显分离的理论方法。一种观点认为,所有这些不同的分离都可归因于有意识体验背后的共同机制的破坏或脱节;另一种可能性是,每种分离都需要根据特定领域的过程和系统进行单独解释。更普遍地说,得出的结论是,内隐知识和外显知识之间的分离并非如心理动力学或弗洛伊德理论家所提出的那种充满情感的无意识过程的运作体现,而是大脑普通计算的自然结果。