Moore Paul A, Salas Christian E, Dockree Suvi, Turnbull Oliver H
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College, DublinDublin, Ireland.
Friary Court Medical CentreKilkenny, Ireland.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 25;8:1418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01418. eCollection 2017.
Individuals with profound amnesia are markedly impaired in explicitly recalling new events, but appear to preserve the capacity to use information from other sources. Amongst these preserved capacities is the ability to form new memories of an nature - a skill at the heart of developing and sustaining interpersonal relationships. The psychoanalytic study of individuals with profound amnesia might contribute to the understanding the importance of each memory system, including effects on key analytic processes such as transference and countertransference. However, psychoanalytic work in the presence of profound amnesia might also require important technical modifications. In the first report of its kind, we describe observations from a long term psychoanalytic process (72 sessions) with an individual (JL) who has profound amnesia after an anoxic episode. The nature of therapy was shaped by JL's impairment in connecting elements that belong to distant (and even relatively close) moments in the therapeutic process. However, we were also able to document areas of preservation, in what appears to be a functioning therapeutic alliance. As regards transference, the relationship between JL and his analyst can be viewed as the evolution of a narcissistic transference, and case material is provided that maps this into three phases: (i) rejecting; (ii) starting to take in; and (iii) full use of the analytic space - where each phase exhibits differing degrees of permeability between JL and the analyst. This investigation appears to have important theoretical implications for psychoanalytic practice, and for psychotherapy in general - and not only with regard to brain injured populations. We especially note that it raises questions concerning the of therapeutic action in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy, and the apparent unimportance of episodic memory for many elements of therapeutic change.
患有严重失忆症的个体在明确回忆新事件方面存在显著障碍,但似乎保留了利用其他来源信息的能力。在这些保留的能力中,有一种形成新记忆的能力——这是发展和维持人际关系的核心技能。对患有严重失忆症个体的精神分析研究可能有助于理解每个记忆系统的重要性,包括对诸如移情和反移情等关键分析过程的影响。然而,在严重失忆症患者身上进行精神分析工作可能也需要重要的技术调整。在同类研究的首份报告中,我们描述了对一名个体(JL)进行的长期精神分析过程(72次疗程)的观察结果,该个体在一次缺氧发作后患有严重失忆症。治疗的性质受到JL在连接治疗过程中属于遥远(甚至相对接近)时刻的元素方面的障碍影响。然而,我们也能够记录下在看似有效的治疗联盟中保留的领域。关于移情,JL与他的分析师之间的关系可被视为一种自恋移情的演变,并提供了案例材料,将其映射为三个阶段:(i)拒绝;(ii)开始接受;(iii)充分利用分析空间——其中每个阶段在JL和分析师之间表现出不同程度的渗透性。这项研究似乎对精神分析实践以及一般心理治疗具有重要的理论意义——而且不仅涉及脑损伤人群。我们特别指出,它提出了关于精神分析和心理治疗中治疗行动的问题,以及情景记忆对许多治疗变化元素的明显不重要性。