Verberne Hein J, Dijkgraaf Marcel G W, Somsen G Aernout, van Eck-Smit Berthe L F
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2003 Sep-Oct;10(5):456-63. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(03)00589-0.
There is inconsistency in reported patient characteristics associated with differences in basal and poststress left ventricular function (delta ejection fraction [DeltaEF]) assessed by gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). This inconsistency may therefore hamper adequate interpretation. In this study we first determined the reproducibility of serial gated SPECT-assessed left ventricular function. Second, we determined whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed directly after stress reflects basal LVEF and, if not, what patient characteristics were associated with this discrepancy in LVEF.
Serial reproducibility of technetium 99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT-assessed LVEF in 22 patients showed a mean difference between two sequential measurements at rest of 0.09% EF units, with a 95% limit of agreement (2 SDs) at 5.8% EF units. In 229 patients Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT was performed after stress and at rest. Independent predictors of DeltaEF were the presence of scintigraphically proven ischemia (standardized coefficient, -1.256; P =.003) and difference in heart rate at the time of acquisition (standardized coefficient, 0.121; P =.001).
Gated SPECT-assessed LVEF at rest is reproducible under standard clinical conditions. However, LVEF assessed after stress does not represent LVEF at rest in patients with scintigraphically proven ischemia and in patients with increased heart rate after stress compared with heart rate at rest.
在通过门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)评估的基础和应激后左心室功能差异(射血分数差值[ΔEF])相关的患者特征报告方面存在不一致性。因此,这种不一致性可能会妨碍充分的解读。在本研究中,我们首先确定了连续门控SPECT评估左心室功能的可重复性。其次,我们确定了应激后直接评估的左心室射血分数(LVEF)是否反映基础LVEF,如果不反映,哪些患者特征与LVEF的这种差异相关。
对22例患者进行的锝99m替曲膦门控SPECT评估的LVEF的连续可重复性显示,静息状态下两次连续测量之间的平均差异为0.09%EF单位,95%一致性界限(2个标准差)为5.8%EF单位。在229例患者中,在应激后和静息状态下进行了锝99m替曲膦门控SPECT检查。ΔEF的独立预测因素是闪烁显像证实的缺血的存在(标准化系数,-1.256;P=0.003)以及采集时心率的差异(标准化系数,0.121;P=0.001)。
在标准临床条件下,门控SPECT评估的静息LVEF是可重复的。然而,对于闪烁显像证实有缺血的患者以及与静息心率相比应激后心率增加的患者,应激后评估的LVEF并不代表静息LVEF。