Iwatsubo Y, Matrat M, Brochard P, Ameille J, Choudat D, Conso F, Coulondre D, Garnier R, Hubert C, Lauzier F, Romano M C, Pairon J C
INSERM E03-37, Cretéil, France.
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Nov;60(11):831-40. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.11.831.
To compare the prevalence and incidence of respiratory symptoms and lung function values between hairdressing apprentices and office apprentices.
A total of 322 hairdressing apprentices and 277 office apprentices (controls) were studied. Two cross sectional surveys were conducted in 1994 and 1996/97 with longitudinal follow up for a subgroup of apprentices (191 hairdressing apprentices and 189 office apprentices).
In the initial phase, the prevalence of respiratory symptoms was significantly lower among hairdressing apprentices than among office apprentices. Lung function test results showed significantly higher values for hairdressing apprentices. Non-specific bronchial reactivity was similar in the two groups. In the final phase, results for respiratory symptoms were similar. The incidence of respiratory symptoms was not significantly different between hairdressing apprentices and office apprentices. Subjects who dropped out had lower values for FVC and FEV1 in the initial phase than those who completed the final phase. There was a significant deterioration of FEV1 and FEF25-75% in hairdressing apprentices compared to office apprentices. There was a link between atopy and the incidence of most of the respiratory symptoms (day/night cough, wheezing, dyspnoea, mucosal hyperresponsiveness) and between smoking and the incidence of bronchial hyperreactivity. There was no significant correlation between change in lung function tests and specific hairdressing activities reported at the end of the apprenticeship or with environmental working conditions in hairdressing salons.
Although a healthy worker effect can be suspected, results showed a significant deterioration of baseline values of lung function tests in the hairdressing apprentice group. However, no clear link was shown between change in lung function tests and specific parameters of occupational activities.
比较美发学徒和办公室学徒呼吸系统症状的患病率及发病率以及肺功能值。
共研究了322名美发学徒和277名办公室学徒(对照组)。1994年和1996/97年进行了两次横断面调查,并对一部分学徒(191名美发学徒和189名办公室学徒)进行了纵向随访。
在初始阶段,美发学徒呼吸系统症状的患病率显著低于办公室学徒。肺功能测试结果显示美发学徒的值显著更高。两组的非特异性支气管反应性相似。在最后阶段,呼吸系统症状的结果相似。美发学徒和办公室学徒呼吸系统症状的发病率无显著差异。退出研究的受试者在初始阶段的用力肺活量(FVC)和第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)值低于完成最后阶段的受试者。与办公室学徒相比,美发学徒的FEV1和呼气流量峰值25%-75%(FEF25-75%)有显著恶化。特应性与大多数呼吸系统症状(白天/夜间咳嗽、喘息、呼吸困难、黏膜高反应性)的发病率之间以及吸烟与支气管高反应性的发病率之间存在关联。肺功能测试的变化与学徒期结束时报告的特定美发活动或美发沙龙的工作环境条件之间无显著相关性。
尽管可能存在健康工人效应,但结果显示美发学徒组肺功能测试的基线值有显著恶化。然而,肺功能测试的变化与职业活动的特定参数之间未显示出明确的关联。