Geffen G M, Butterworth P, Geffen L B
Psychology Department and Clinical Studies Unit, University of Queensland and Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1994 Jul;9(4):303-16.
The equivalence between the original form (Form 1) of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), and a new form (Form 4) was examined in 51 normal adult subjects (20-67 years) of average estimated intelligence who were assessed in two separate sessions. Performance on the new form was equivalent to that on the original and most measures on the two tests showed significant positive correlations. Test-retest reliability of AVLT scores between sessions was also assessed, both globally and separately for Form 1 followed by Form 4 and for the reverse order. The most reliable measures on the AVLT were the total number of words learned over the five learning trials, (r =.77), and performance on the retention trial of the learning list following the presentation and performance of the distractor list (r =.70). These measures are sufficiently robust for use in clinical serial assessments.
在51名平均智力水平正常的成年受试者(20至67岁)中,对听觉言语学习测试(AVLT)的原始形式(形式1)和新形式(形式4)之间的等效性进行了检验,这些受试者在两个独立的阶段接受评估。新形式的表现与原始形式相当,并且两项测试的大多数指标都显示出显著的正相关。还评估了各阶段之间AVLT分数的重测信度,包括整体以及先进行形式1再进行形式4和相反顺序的单独情况。AVLT上最可靠的指标是在五次学习试验中学习的单词总数(r = 0.77),以及在呈现干扰列表并完成其表现之后学习列表的记忆试验中的表现(r = 0.70)。这些指标足够稳健,可用于临床系列评估。