Heinik Jeremia, Solomesh Isaac, Berkman Pinhas
Margoletz Psychogeriatric Center, Ichilov Hospital, 6 Weizman Street, Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2003.08.004.
Our objective was to assess the correlation between (1) the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) (including the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]) score and three clock drawing tests (CDT) and (2) the three CDTs independently, in a specialized outpatient psychogeriatric service. One hundred and fourteen subjects completed a comprehensive evaluation and were allocated to one of the following groups: dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) in 52; vascular dementia (VD) in 36; non-dementia (ND; Mood or Anxiety Disorders) in 26. When the entire sample of patients is considered, all three CDTs used were highly and significantly correlated to the MMSE score, the CAMCOG score, and to each other. In this patient population, these cognitive tests may be interchangeable for providing an initial objective measure of cognitive function. However, when the same correlations were studied in the separate diagnostic groups, in the dementia group (DAT and VD) even though the high correlations between the various CDTs themselves did not change, the correlations between the MMSE score, the CAMCOG score and the CDTs decreased, more evidently in the VD group. This trend became even more conspicuous in the ND group, where some of the above mentioned correlations became non-significant. We hypothesize that in a real clinical situation the clinician initially assumes the role of cognitive "evaluator" (in terms of the total sample) followed by the role of cognitive "monitor" (in relation to specific diagnostic groups). In the first instance, CDTs, the MMSE, and the CAMCOG might be considered interchangeable as an initial objective measure of cognitive dysfunction, while in the second role, different CDTs might be diversely used, presumably supplemented by other cognitive tests and clinical methods.
我们的目标是在一家专业门诊老年精神科服务机构中,评估以下两者之间的相关性:(1)剑桥认知检查(CAMCOG)(包括简易精神状态检查表[MMSE])得分与三项画钟试验(CDT);(2)三项CDT之间的相关性。114名受试者完成了全面评估,并被分配到以下组之一:52例阿尔茨海默病型痴呆(DAT);36例血管性痴呆(VD);26例非痴呆(ND;情绪或焦虑障碍)。当考虑所有患者样本时,所使用的所有三项CDT与MMSE得分、CAMCOG得分以及它们彼此之间均高度显著相关。在该患者群体中,这些认知测试在提供认知功能的初始客观测量方面可能是可互换的。然而,当在单独的诊断组中研究相同的相关性时,在痴呆组(DAT和VD)中,尽管各CDT之间的高相关性没有变化,但MMSE得分、CAMCOG得分与CDT之间的相关性降低,在VD组中更为明显。这种趋势在ND组中变得更加显著,其中上述一些相关性变得不显著。我们假设,在实际临床情况下,临床医生最初承担认知“评估者”的角色(就总样本而言),随后承担认知“监测者”的角色(相对于特定诊断组)。在第一种情况下,CDT、MMSE和CAMCOG可能被视为可互换的认知功能障碍初始客观测量方法,而在第二种角色中,可能会不同地使用不同的CDT,大概会辅以其他认知测试和临床方法。