• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Critical perspectives in animal agriculture: a response.

作者信息

Nielsen M S Weber, Bergfeld E

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2003 Nov;81(11):2908-11. doi: 10.2527/2003.81112908x.

DOI:10.2527/2003.81112908x
PMID:14601896
Abstract

People who work in the animal industries are faced with questions and criticisms about a variety of contentious issues, including animal management practices, ethics, diversity in animal agriculture, and animal welfare. Formulating responses to these questions requires a critical evaluation of our own work and open discussion of these controversial issues. Effective debate on these issues can be accomplished only with input from philosophers and social scientists skilled in such discussions, in addition to animal scientists. Therefore, animal scientists must engage in discussions of controversial issues among themselves and with entities outside agriculture. Furthermore, we must accept responsibility for the application of research results and any potential negative consequences. Because society is increasingly concerned with issues of animal welfare and the effects of new technologies, we should increase communications and transparency with the public. Increased diversity of race and gender will increase the ability of animal agriculture to connect with our stakeholders and to communicate the relevance of our work to society. Animal scientists need a professional ethic that espouses a higher level of understanding and commitment to philosophical discussions of contentious issues.

摘要

相似文献

1
Critical perspectives in animal agriculture: a response.
J Anim Sci. 2003 Nov;81(11):2908-11. doi: 10.2527/2003.81112908x.
2
Critical perspectives of animal agriculture: introduction.畜牧业的批判性视角:引言
J Anim Sci. 2003 Nov;81(11):2880-6. doi: 10.2527/2003.81112880x.
3
Livestock, ethics, and quality of life.家畜、伦理与生活质量。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Nov;81(11):2887-94. doi: 10.2527/2003.81112887x.
4
A survey to determine public opinion about the ethics and governance of farm animal welfare.一项旨在确定公众对农场动物福利伦理与治理看法的调查。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Oct 1;233(7):1121-6. doi: 10.2460/javma.233.7.1121.
5
Board-invited review: the ethical and behavioral bases for farm animal welfare legislation.特邀综述:农场动物福利立法的伦理与行为基础
J Anim Sci. 2007 Feb;85(2):556-65. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-422.
6
Defining a middle ground for philosophers and production: bioethics.为哲学家和生产者界定中间地带:生物伦理学。
Poult Sci. 2004 Mar;83(3):310-3. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.3.310.
7
The concept of animal welfare at the interface between producers and scientists: the example of organic pig farming.生产者与科学家之间的动物福利理念:以有机养猪业为例。
Acta Biotheor. 2011 Jun;59(2):173-83. doi: 10.1007/s10441-011-9135-z. Epub 2011 May 11.
8
After Dolly--ethical limits to the use of biotechnology on farm animals.多莉诞生之后——农场动物生物技术应用的伦理界限
Theriogenology. 2006 Mar 15;65(5):992-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.012. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
9
Current ethical issues in animal biotechnology.动物生物技术中的当前伦理问题。
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20(1):67-73. doi: 10.1071/rd07184.
10
Ethical perspectives of the Australian live export trade.澳大利亚活畜出口贸易的伦理视角。
Aust Vet J. 2005 Sep;83(9):558-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2005.tb13336.x.