Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg E M, Heindel W, Fischbach R
Department of Clinical Radiology, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University of Münster, Münster; Germany.
Acta Radiol. 2003 Nov;44(6):597-603. doi: 10.1080/02841850312331287719.
To assess patency and lumen visibility of coronary artery stents by multislice-CT angiography (MSCTA) in comparison with conventional coronary angiography as the standard of reference.
47 stents of 13 different types were evaluated in 29 patients. MSCTA was performed on a 4-slice scanner with a standard coronary protocol (detector collimation 4 x 1 mm; table feed 1.5 mm/rotation, 400 mAs, 120 kV). Image evaluation was performed by two readers who were blinded to the reports from the catheter angiography. MIP reconstructions were evaluated for image quality on a 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = excellent) and stent patency (contrast distal to the stent as an indirect patency sign). Axial images and multiplanar reformations through the stents were used for assessment of stent lumen visibility (measurement of the visible stent lumen diameter) and detection of relevant in-stent stenosis (> or =50%).
Image quality was fair to good on average (score 2.64 +/- 1.0) and depended on the heart rate (heart rate 45-60: average score 3.2, heart rate 61-70: average score 2.8, heart rate >71: average score 1.4). Thirty-seven stents were correctly classified as patent, 1 was correctly classified as occluded and 9 stents were not assessible due to insufficient image quality because of triggering artifacts. Parts of the stent lumen could be visualized in 30 cases. On average, 20-40% of the stent lumen diameter was visible. Twenty-five stents were correctly classified as having no stenosis, 1 was falsely classified as stenosed, 1 was correctly classified as occluded. In 20 stents lumen visibility was not sufficient for stenosis evaluation.
Although the stent lumen may be partly visualized in most stents, a reliable evaluation of in-stent stenoses does not seem practical by 4-slice MSCT. Nevertheless, for stent patency evaluation, MS-CTA might provide valuable clinical information. With submillimeter MSCT (e.g., 16-slice scanners) and more sophisticated reconstruction algorithms, further improvements may be expected.
通过多层螺旋CT血管造影(MSCTA)评估冠状动脉支架的通畅性和管腔可视性,并与作为参考标准的传统冠状动脉造影进行比较。
对29例患者的47个13种不同类型的支架进行评估。在一台4层螺旋CT扫描仪上采用标准冠状动脉扫描方案进行MSCTA检查(探测器准直为4×1mm;床速1.5mm/旋转,400mAs,120kV)。由两名对导管血管造影报告不知情的阅片者进行图像评估。对最大密度投影(MIP)重建图像的质量按4分制进行评估(1分=差,4分=优),并评估支架通畅性(以支架远端的对比剂作为间接通畅征象)。通过支架的轴位图像和多平面重组图像用于评估支架管腔可视性(测量可见支架管腔直径)以及检测相关的支架内狭窄(≥50%)。
图像质量平均为中等至良好(评分2.64±1.0),且取决于心率(心率45 - 60:平均评分3.2,心率61 - 70:平均评分2.8,心率>71:平均评分1.4)。37个支架被正确分类为通畅,1个被正确分类为闭塞,9个支架因触发伪影导致图像质量不佳而无法评估。30例可观察到部分支架管腔。平均可见支架管腔直径的20% - 40%。25个支架被正确分类为无狭窄,1个被错误分类为狭窄,1个被正确分类为闭塞。20个支架的管腔可视性不足以进行狭窄评估。
尽管大多数支架的管腔可能部分可见,但4层MSCT似乎无法对支架内狭窄进行可靠评估。然而,对于支架通畅性评估,MSCTA可能提供有价值的临床信息。使用亚毫米级MSCT(如16层螺旋CT扫描仪)和更复杂的重建算法,有望进一步改善。