• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雇主健康保险与当地劳动力市场状况。

Employer health insurance and local labor market conditions.

作者信息

Marquis M S, Long S H

机构信息

RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Sep-Dec;1(3-4):273-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1013767618851.

DOI:10.1023/a:1013767618851
PMID:14625929
Abstract

Theory suggests that an employer's decisions about the amount of health insurance included in the compensation package may be influenced by the practices of other employers in the market. We test the role of local market conditions on decisions of small employers to offer insurance and their dollar contribution to premiums using data from two large national surveys of employers. These employers are more likely to offer insurance and to make greater contributions in communities with tighter labor markets, less concentrated labor purchasers, greater union penetration, and a greater share of workers in big business and a small share in regulated industries. However, our data do not support the notion that marginal tax rates affect employers' offer decision or contributions.

摘要

理论表明,雇主在薪酬包中纳入医疗保险金额的决策可能会受到市场上其他雇主做法的影响。我们利用两项针对雇主的大型全国性调查数据,检验当地市场状况对小雇主提供保险决策及其保费资金贡献的作用。在劳动力市场更紧张、劳动力购买者集中度较低、工会渗透率较高、大企业中工人比例较大且受监管行业中工人比例较小的社区,这些雇主更有可能提供保险并做出更大贡献。然而,我们的数据并不支持边际税率影响雇主提供保险决策或贡献这一观点。

相似文献

1
Employer health insurance and local labor market conditions.雇主健康保险与当地劳动力市场状况。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Sep-Dec;1(3-4):273-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1013767618851.
2
The effect of marginal tax rate on the probability of employment-based insurance by risk group.边际税率对不同风险群体基于就业的保险概率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 2):239-51.
3
Workers' decisions to take-up offered health insurance coverage: assessing the importance of out-of-pocket premium costs.工人接受所提供医疗保险覆盖范围的决策:评估自付保费成本的重要性。
Med Care. 2003 Jul;41(7 Suppl):III35-III43. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000076050.73075.51.
4
Small firms' demand for health insurance: the decision to offer insurance.小公司对医疗保险的需求:提供保险的决策
Inquiry. 2002 Summer;39(2):118-37. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.2.118.
5
Defined contribution health benefits.固定缴款型健康福利
EBRI Issue Brief. 2001 Mar(231):1-30.
6
Low-wage workers and health insurance coverage: can policymakers target them through their employers?低薪工人与医疗保险覆盖范围:政策制定者能否通过雇主将他们作为目标群体?
Inquiry. 2001 Fall;38(3):331-7. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.3.331.
7
Small employers and health benefits: findings from the 2000 Small Employer Health Benefits Survey.小型雇主与健康福利:2000年小型雇主健康福利调查结果
EBRI Issue Brief. 2000 Oct(226):1-22.
8
Estimating workers' marginal valuation of employer health benefits: would insured workers prefer more health insurance or higher wages?估算员工对雇主健康福利的边际估值:参保员工会更倾向于更多的健康保险还是更高的工资?
J Health Econ. 2008 Jan;27(1):89-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.013. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
9
To offer or not to offer: the role of price in employers' health insurance decisions.提供还是不提供:价格在雇主医疗保险决策中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Oct;36(5):935-58.
10
Employee demand for health insurance and employer health plan choices.员工对健康保险的需求以及雇主的健康计划选择。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):65-88. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00127-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The US healthcare workforce and the labor market effect on healthcare spending and health outcomes.美国医疗保健劳动力以及劳动力市场对医疗保健支出和健康结果的影响。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2014 Jun;14(2):127-41. doi: 10.1007/s10754-014-9142-0. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
2
Differential impacts of public health insurance expansions at the local level.地方层面公共医疗保险扩张的差异化影响。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2007 Mar;7(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10754-007-9009-8. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
3
Employer choices of family premium sharing.

本文引用的文献

1
Marketplace. What's keeping employers from adopting defined contribution health benefit plans.市场。是什么阻碍雇主采用定额供款健康福利计划。
Med Health. 2000 Nov 13;54(44):suppl 1-2.
2
'Competition' among employers offering health insurance.提供医疗保险的雇主之间的“竞争”。
J Health Econ. 2000 Jan;19(1):121-40. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00007-7.
3
Comparing employee health benefits in the public and private sectors, 1997.1997年公共部门与私营部门员工健康福利比较
雇主对家庭保险费分担的选择。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2006 Mar;6(1):25-47. doi: 10.1007/s10754-006-5560-y.
4
Why do employers do what they do? Compensating differentials.雇主为何如此行事?补偿性工资差异。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Sep-Dec;1(3-4):195-201. doi: 10.1023/a:1013776317034.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 Nov-Dec;18(6):183-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.6.183.
4
Worker demand for health insurance in the non-group market.非团体市场中工人对医疗保险的需求。
J Health Econ. 1995 May;14(1):47-63. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00035-3.
5
Gaps in employer coverage: lack of supply or lack of demand?雇主医保覆盖范围的缺口:是供应不足还是需求缺乏?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993;12 Suppl:282-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.suppl_1.282.
6
Private employment-based health insurance in ten states.十个州基于雇主的私人医疗保险。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Summer;14(2):199-211. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.2.199.