• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助产士工作量与护理过程质量(连续电子胎儿监护[CEFM])及新生儿结局指标是否相关?苏格兰由顾问主导的产房的一项前瞻性研究。

Is midwife workload associated with quality of process of care (continuous electronic fetal monitoring [CEFM]) and neonatal outcome indicators? A prospective study in consultant-led labour wards in Scotland.

作者信息

Tucker J, Parry G, Penney G, Page M, Hundley V

机构信息

Dugald Baird Centre for Research on Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;17(4):369-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00524.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00524.x
PMID:14629319
Abstract

Evidence for staffing recommendations in labour wards is scant. This study aimed to test association between midwife workload with adjusted process of continuous electronic fetal monitoring (CEFM) and neonatal outcome indicators. This was a prospective workload study in 23 consultant-led labour wards in Scotland. There were 3489 livebirths during September 2000, and 1561 consecutively delivered women with CEFM case review during the mid-two weeks. Process measures were: adjusted rates of CEFM, appropriate CEFM, and time to medical response for a serious fetal heart trace abnormality. Neonatal outcome indicators were: Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, admission to neonatal unit (NNU) > 48 hours, and neonatal resuscitation. Complete information was available for 99% (2553/2576) of workload time points, 99% (1559) of CEFM process, and 3083 eligible neonates. There were no associations between occupancy or staffing ratios and adjusted CEFM process, Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes (0.98 [0.83, 1.15]) or admission to NNU for > 48 hours (0.97 [0.95, 1.00]). However, there was association between increasing staffing ratios and lower odds of adjusted neonatal resuscitation (excluding bag and mask only) (0.97 [0.94, 0.99]). The direction of effect of increasing workload suggests detriment to outcome indicators, although the size of effect may be small.

摘要

关于产房人员配置建议的证据很少。本研究旨在测试助产士工作量与连续电子胎儿监护(CEFM)调整过程及新生儿结局指标之间的关联。这是一项在苏格兰23个由顾问主导的产房进行的前瞻性工作量研究。2000年9月有3489例活产,在中间两周有1561例连续分娩的妇女接受了CEFM病例审查。过程指标包括:CEFM调整率、适当的CEFM以及对严重胎儿心率异常的医疗反应时间。新生儿结局指标包括:5分钟时阿氏评分<7分、入住新生儿重症监护病房(NNU)超过48小时以及新生儿复苏。99%(2553/2576)的工作量时间点、99%(1559)的CEFM过程以及3083例符合条件的新生儿有完整信息。床位占用率或人员配置比例与调整后的CEFM过程、5分钟时阿氏评分<7分(0.98[0.83,1.15])或入住NNU超过48小时(0.97[0.95,1.00])之间没有关联。然而,人员配置比例增加与调整后新生儿复苏(不包括仅使用气囊面罩)几率降低之间存在关联(0.97[0.94,0.99])。工作量增加的影响方向表明对结局指标不利,尽管影响大小可能较小。

相似文献

1
Is midwife workload associated with quality of process of care (continuous electronic fetal monitoring [CEFM]) and neonatal outcome indicators? A prospective study in consultant-led labour wards in Scotland.助产士工作量与护理过程质量(连续电子胎儿监护[CEFM])及新生儿结局指标是否相关?苏格兰由顾问主导的产房的一项前瞻性研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;17(4):369-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00524.x.
2
Patient volume, staffing, and workload in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation.英国新生儿重症监护病房随机分层样本中与风险调整后结局相关的患者数量、人员配备和工作量:一项前瞻性评估
Lancet. 2002 Jan 12;359(9301):99-107. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07366-x.
3
Impact of continuous electronic fetal monitoring on birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancies.电子胎心监护连续监测对低危妊娠分娩结局的影响。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):311-317. doi: 10.1111/birt.12422. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
4
Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.分娩期间间歇性与连续性电子监测:一项随机研究。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Aug;101(8):663-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13181.x.
5
Comparison of midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in Singapore: A retrospective cohort study.新加坡助产士主导护理与产科医生主导护理对母婴结局的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
6
Fetal health surveillance in labour.产时胎儿健康监测
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Mar;24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80.
7
A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.伙伴关系模式下的助产士护理与传统团队助产士护理的比较:分娩及产程结局
Midwifery. 2001 Sep;17(3):234-40. doi: 10.1054/midw.2001.0257.
8
Evaluating palliative care ward staffing using bed occupancy, patient dependency, staff activity, service quality and cost data.利用床位占用率、患者依赖程度、员工活动、服务质量和成本数据评估姑息治疗病房的人员配备。
Palliat Med. 2013 Feb;27(2):123-30. doi: 10.1177/0269216312447593. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
9
Intrapartum and neonatal mortality among low-risk women in midwife-led versus obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: a propensity score matched study.荷兰阿姆斯特丹地区由助产士主导护理与由产科医生主导护理的低风险女性的产时及新生儿死亡率:一项倾向得分匹配研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 5;8(1):e018845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018845.
10
Evaluation of an experimental midwife-led unit in Scotland.苏格兰一个由助产士主导的实验单元的评估。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Mar;23(2):121-9. doi: 10.1080/0144361031000074619.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of midwife workload on delivery of care, and mother and baby outcomes in maternity settings in OECD countries: A systematic review.经合组织国家产科环境中助产士工作量对护理提供以及母婴结局的影响:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0329117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329117. eCollection 2025.
2
The association between midwifery staffing and reported harmful incidents: a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected data.助产士人员配备与报告的伤害事件之间的关联:常规收集数据的横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10812-8.
3
Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 1. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020).
足月阴道分娩 - 第1部分。德国妇产科学会、奥地利妇产科学会和瑞士妇产科学会指南(S3级,德国医学和科学信息平台注册号015/083,2020年12月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 3;82(11):1143-1193. doi: 10.1055/a-1904-6546. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Vaginal Birth at Term - Part 2. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/083, December 2020).足月阴道分娩 - 第2部分。德国妇产科学会、奥地利妇产科学会和瑞士妇产科学会指南(S3级,德国医学科学院注册编号015/083,2020年12月)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Nov 3;82(11):1194-1248. doi: 10.1055/a-1904-6769. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
One-to-one care routines and compliance with the national professional recommendation on continuous intrapartum support in Norway: A national survey.挪威一对一护理常规及对国家关于产时持续支持的专业建议的遵循情况:一项全国性调查。
Eur J Midwifery. 2019 Jul 25;3:14. doi: 10.18332/ejm/110064. eCollection 2019.
6
The Association Between Hospital Capacity Strain and Inpatient Outcomes in Highly Developed Countries: A Systematic Review.发达国家医院容量紧张与住院患者结局之间的关联:一项系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):686-696. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3936-3. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
7
The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system.助产士的出勤率和工作量与分娩方式之间的关联:德国医疗保健系统中的二次分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Sep 2;14:300. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-300.