Lerner Melvin J
University of Waterloo and Florida Atlantic University, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):389-99. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_10.
Beginning shortly after the 2nd World War, 3 lines of research associated with relative deprivation, equity theory, and just world contributed to the description of the influence of the justice motive in people's lives. By the late 1960s, these converging lines of research had documented the importance of people's desire for justice; nevertheless, contemporary social psychologists typically portray this justice-driven motivation as simply a manifestation of self-interest. The explanation for this failure to recognize a distinct and important justice motive points to the widespread reliance on research methods that elicit the participant's thoughtfully constructed narratives or role-playing responses. According to recent theoretical advances, these methods generate responses that reflect normative expectations of rational self-interest, and fail to capture the important effects of the emotionally generated imperatives of the justice motive.
第二次世界大战后不久,与相对剥夺、公平理论和公正世界相关的三条研究路线,为描述正义动机在人们生活中的影响做出了贡献。到20世纪60年代末,这些相互融合的研究路线已经证明了人们对正义的渴望的重要性;然而,当代社会心理学家通常将这种由正义驱动的动机仅仅描绘为自我利益的一种表现。对于未能认识到一种独特且重要的正义动机的这种解释,指向了对研究方法的广泛依赖,这些方法引发参与者经过深思熟虑构建的叙述或角色扮演反应。根据最近的理论进展,这些方法产生的反应反映了对理性自我利益的规范期望,并且未能捕捉到正义动机中由情感产生的紧迫性所带来的重要影响。