• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神障碍的分类模型与维度模型:分型测量证据

Categorical versus dimensional models of mental disorder: the taxometric evidence.

作者信息

Haslam Nick

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;37(6):696-704. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2003.01258.x.

DOI:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2003.01258.x
PMID:14636384
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review studies of the categorical versus dimensional status of mental disorders that employ taxometric methodology.

METHOD

A comprehensive qualitative review of all published taxometric studies of psychopathology.

RESULTS

Categorical and dimensional models each receive well-replicated support for some groups of mental disorders. Studies favour categorical models for melancholia, eating disorders, pathological dissociation, and schizotypal and antisocial personality disorders. Dimensional models tend to be favoured for the broad neurotic spectrum--general depression, generalized anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder--and for borderline personality disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Taxometric research clarifies the latent structure of psychopathology in ways that have implications for the classification, assessment, explanation and conceptualization of mental disorder.

摘要

目的

回顾采用分类分析方法研究精神障碍分类与维度状态的相关研究。

方法

对所有已发表的精神病理学分类分析研究进行全面的定性综述。

结果

分类模型和维度模型在某些精神障碍组中均得到了充分重复的支持。研究表明,分类模型适用于忧郁症、饮食失调、病理性解离、分裂型人格障碍和反社会人格障碍。维度模型则更适用于广泛的神经症谱系——一般性抑郁、广泛性焦虑、创伤后应激障碍——以及边缘型人格障碍。

结论

分类分析研究以对精神障碍的分类、评估、解释和概念化有影响的方式阐明了精神病理学的潜在结构。

相似文献

1
Categorical versus dimensional models of mental disorder: the taxometric evidence.精神障碍的分类模型与维度模型:分型测量证据
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;37(6):696-704. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2003.01258.x.
2
Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research.人格与精神病理学中的类别与维度:分类测量研究的定量综述。
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):903-20. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001966. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
3
Dimensions over categories: a meta-analysis of taxometric research.超越范畴的维度:分类测量研究的元分析。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(9):1418-1432. doi: 10.1017/S003329172000183X. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
A taxometric study of borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍的阈限模型研究
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):657-66. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.657.
5
Categories and continua: a review of taxometric research.类别与连续体:一项税式计量研究综述
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2002 Aug;128(3):271-320.
6
Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of cluster-C, paranoid, and borderline personality disorders.轴 II 障碍聚类-C、偏执型和边缘型人格障碍的维度结构的分类测量学证据。
J Pers Disord. 2009 Dec;23(6):606-28. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.6.606.
7
Is antisocial personality disorder continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis.反社会人格障碍是连续性的还是类别性的?一项计量法分析。
Psychol Med. 2006 Nov;36(11):1571-81. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008245. Epub 2006 Jul 12.
8
Taxometric investigation of depression: evidence of consistent latent structure across clinical and community samples.抑郁症的分类分析研究:临床样本与社区样本中一致潜在结构的证据
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 May;41(5):403-10. doi: 10.1080/00048670701261194.
9
Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure.taxometric 分析作为区分类别和维度潜在结构的一般策略。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Jun;17(2):284-93. doi: 10.1037/a0026973. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
10
Latent structure of depression in a community sample: a taxometric analysis.社区样本中抑郁症的潜在结构:一项分类分析。
Psychol Med. 2005 Apr;35(4):489-97. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704003708.

引用本文的文献

1
Building an Early Warning System for Depression: Rationale, Objectives, and Methods of the WARN-D Study.构建抑郁症早期预警系统:WARN-D研究的基本原理、目标与方法
Clin Psychol Eur. 2023 Sep 29;5(3):e10075. doi: 10.32872/cpe.10075. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Revisiting the theoretical and methodological foundations of depression measurement.重新审视抑郁症测量的理论和方法基础。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Jun;1(6):358-368. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00050-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Identifying Transdiagnostic Mechanisms in Mental Health Using Computational Factor Modeling.
使用计算因子建模识别心理健康中的跨诊断机制。
Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 15;93(8):690-703. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.09.034. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
4
How selves differ within and across cognitive domains: self-prioritisation, self-concept, and psychiatric traits.认知领域内和跨领域的自我差异:自我优先化、自我概念和精神特质。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 30;10(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00870-0.
5
Using brief measures to identify depression and other mental disorders: A challenge for research and clinical practice.使用简短测量方法识别抑郁症及其他精神障碍:对研究和临床实践的一项挑战。
Internet Interv. 2021 Sep 1;28:100450. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100450. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Stratification of adolescents across mental phenomena emphasizes the importance of transdiagnostic distress: a replication in two general population cohorts.青少年在心理现象上的分层强调了跨诊断痛苦的重要性:在两个普通人群队列中的重复研究
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 May;32(5):797-807. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01909-0. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
7
Developing Multimodal Dynamic Functional Connectivity as a Neuroimaging Biomarker.开发多模态动态功能连接作为神经影像学生物标志物。
Brain Connect. 2021 Sep;11(7):529-542. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0900. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
A Network Analysis of Major Depressive Disorder Symptoms and Age- and Gender-Related Differences in People over 65 in a Madrid Community Sample (Spain).基于马德里社区样本(西班牙)中超过 65 岁人群的网络分析:重度抑郁症症状与年龄和性别相关差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;17(23):8934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238934.
9
Toward Quantifying the Psychopathology of Eating Disorders From the Autonomic Nervous System Perspective: A Methodological Approach.从自主神经系统视角量化饮食失调的精神病理学:一种方法论途径
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 1;13:606. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00606. eCollection 2019.
10
Errors in the 2017 APA Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of PTSD: What the Data Actually Says.《2017年美国心理学会创伤后应激障碍治疗临床实践指南》中的错误:数据实际表明的情况
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 22;8:1425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01425. eCollection 2017.