Suppr超能文献

灵长类动物的反眼跳。II. 辅助眼区神经元活动可预测正确表现。

Primate antisaccade. II. Supplementary eye field neuronal activity predicts correct performance.

作者信息

Amador Nelly, Schlag-Rey Madeleine, Schlag John

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Brain Research Institute, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-1763, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1672-89. doi: 10.1152/jn.00138.2003. Epub 2003 Nov 26.

Abstract

Neuronal activities were recorded in the supplementary eye field (SEF) of 3 macaque monkeys trained to perform antisaccades pseudorandomly interleaved with prosaccades, as instructed by the shape of a central fixation point. The prosaccade goal was indicated by a peripheral stimulus flashed anywhere on the screen, whereas the antisaccade goal was an unmarked site diametrically opposite the flashed stimulus. The visual cue was given immediately after the instruction cue disappeared in the immediate-saccade task, or during the instruction period in the delayed-saccade task. The instruction cue offset was the saccade gosignal. Here we focus on 92 task-related neurons: visual, eye-movement, and instruction/fixation neurons. We found that 73% of SEF eye-movement-related neurons fired significantly more before anti-saccades than prosaccades. This finding was analyzed at 3 levels: population, single neuron, and individual trial. On individual antisaccade trials, 40 ms before saccade, the firing rate of eye-movement-related neurons was highly predictive of successful performance. A similar analysis of visual responses (40 ms astride the peak) gave less-coherent results. Fixation neurons, activated during the initial instruction period (i.e., after the instruction cue but before the stimulus) always fired more on antisaccade than on prosaccade trials. This trend, however, was statistically significant for only half of these neurons. We conclude that the SEF is critically involved in the production of antisaccades.

摘要

在3只经过训练的猕猴的辅助眼区(SEF)记录神经元活动。训练要求猕猴按照中央注视点的形状,伪随机交替进行反扫视和平视扫视。外周刺激在屏幕上任意位置闪烁表示平视扫视目标,而反扫视目标是与闪烁刺激相对的无标记位置。在即时扫视任务中,指令线索消失后立即给出视觉线索;在延迟扫视任务中,视觉线索在指令期内给出。指令线索消失即为扫视启动信号。在此,我们聚焦于92个与任务相关的神经元:视觉神经元、眼动神经元以及指令/注视神经元。我们发现,73%的SEF眼动相关神经元在反扫视前的放电显著多于平视扫视前。这一发现从群体、单个神经元和单次试验三个层面进行了分析。在单次反扫视试验中,扫视前40毫秒,眼动相关神经元的放电率对成功完成任务具有高度预测性。对视觉反应(在峰值前后40毫秒)进行的类似分析结果不太一致。注视神经元在初始指令期(即指令线索出现后但刺激出现前)被激活,在反扫视试验中的放电总是多于平视扫视试验。然而,只有一半的这类神经元呈现出的这种趋势具有统计学意义。我们得出结论,SEF在反扫视的产生过程中起着关键作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验