• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cross-task strategic effects.

作者信息

Rastle Kathleen, Kinoshita Sachiko, Lupker Stephen J, Coltheart Max

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, England.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):867-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03196441.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196441
PMID:14651295
Abstract

When easy and difficult items are mixed together, their reading aloud latencies become more homogeneous relative to their presentation in unmixed ("pure") conditions (Lupker, Brown, & Colombo, 1997). We report two experiments designed to investigate the nature of the mechanism that underlies this list composition, or blocking, effect. In Experiment 1, we replicated Lupker et al.'s (1997) blocking effect in the reading aloud task and extended these findings to the visual lexical decision task. In Experiment 2, we found that blocking effects generalized across tasks: The characteristics of stimuli in a visual lexical decision task influenced reading aloud latencies, and vice versa, when visual lexical decision and reading aloud trials were presented alternately in the same experiment. We discuss implications of these results within time-criterion (Lupker et al., 1997) and strength-of-processing (Kello & Plaut, 2000, 2003) theories of strategic processing in reading.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cross-task strategic effects.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):867-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03196441.
2
Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.邻域大小和暴露持续时间对视觉单词识别的影响:来自是/否和Go/No-Go词汇判断任务的证据
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Feb;65(2):273-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03194799.
3
Beyond the initial 140 ms, lexical decision and reading aloud are different tasks: An ERP study with topographic analysis.超过最初的 140 毫秒,词汇判断和朗读是不同的任务:一项具有地形分析的 ERP 研究。
Neuroimage. 2015 Nov 15;122:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.080. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
4
Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.通过条件朗读的大规模研究来审视文字处理。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2295-2313. doi: 10.1177/1747021817741269. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
6
The electrophysiological correlates of developmental dyslexia: New insights from lexical decision and reading aloud in adults.发展性阅读障碍的电生理相关性:成人词汇判断和朗读的新见解。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Dec;121:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
7
Reading aloud and lexical decision in neglect dyslexia patients: a dissociation.忽视型失读症患者的大声朗读与词汇判断:一种分离现象。
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(8):877-85. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00015-0.
8
Participants shift response deadlines based on list difficulty during reading-aloud megastudies.在大声朗读大型研究中,参与者会根据列表难度调整反应截止时间。
Mem Cognit. 2017 May;45(4):589-599. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0678-8.
9
Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.重新定义正字法邻域:加法和减法邻域在词汇判断和阅读中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1550-70. doi: 10.1037/a0014253.
10
On the role of set when reading aloud: a dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing.关于朗读时组块的作用:词前加工与词汇加工的分离。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):135-44. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid online assessment of reading ability.快速在线阅读能力评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 18;11(1):6396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85907-x.
2
Visual word learning in adults with dyslexia.成人阅读障碍者的视觉词汇学习。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 6;8:264. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00264. eCollection 2014.
3
To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.使用还是移动:目标设定调节抓握真实工具时的启动效应。

本文引用的文献

1
Strategic effects in word naming: examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts.单词命名中的策略效应:检验基于路径强调与基于时间标准的解释
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):139-51. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.29.1.139.
2
Effects of filler type in naming: change in time criterion or attentional control of pathways?
Mem Cognit. 2002 Dec;30(8):1277-87. doi: 10.3758/bf03213409.
3
358,534 nonwords: the ARC Nonword Database.358,534个非单词:ARC非单词数据库。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(1):125-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2705-0. Epub 2011 May 17.
4
Temporal course of word recognition in skilled readers: a magnetoencephalography study.熟练阅读者单词识别的时间进程:一项脑磁图研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 30;197(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.07.038. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
5
How lexical decision is affected by recent experience: symmetric versus asymmetric frequency-blocking effects.近期经历如何影响词汇判断:对称与非对称频率阻断效应
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):726-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03193591.
6
Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words.阿拉伯数字与数字词处理中的不对称性。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):164-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03195829.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1339-62. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000099.
4
On the complexities of measuring naming.论测量命名的复杂性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Apr;28(2):307-14. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.307.
5
DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.DRC:视觉单词识别与大声朗读的双路径级联模型。
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204.
6
Sequential effects in naming: a time-criterion account.命名中的顺序效应:一种时间标准解释
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):117-38.
7
Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.任务切换中的认知控制建模。
Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):234-49. doi: 10.1007/s004269900004.
8
Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task.单词阅读中的策略控制:来自节奏命名任务中快速反应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):719-50. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.719.
9
Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming.命名过程中词汇和次词汇通路的启动与注意控制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):121-35. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.121.
10
Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in mixed blocks of trials: evidence for cost in switching between computational processes.在混合试验块中识别不同感知类别的刺激:计算过程切换成本的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Feb;25(1):3-23. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.1.3.