• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Impact of sublingual immunotherapy on seasonal asthma and skin reactivity in children allergic to Parietaria pollen treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate.

作者信息

Pajno G B, Vita D, Parmiani S, Caminiti L, La Grutta S, Barberio G

机构信息

Paediatric Clinic, Messina Polyclinic Hospital, Messina University, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Dec;33(12):1641-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2003.01809.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2003.01809.x
PMID:14656349
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is a recognized treatment for allergic respiratory diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To study the usefulness of immunotherapy in combination with optimal pharmacological therapy.

METHODS

Thirty-eight children (8-14 years) suffering from seasonal asthma+/-rhinoconjunctivitis due to Parietaria poorly controlled by anti-allergic drugs treatment were selected. After randomization according to a double-blind placebo-controlled design they received active sublingual immunotherapy (15 children) or placebo (15 children) for 13 months combined with inhaled fluticasone twice a day during the pollen season. Eight children were taken as control, whereas all patients were instructed to take symptomatic drugs on need. Early and late skin response to the allergen were assessed in all patients before and after treatment. Drug and symptom scores, as well as visual analogue scores (VASs) and Parietaria pollen counts were assessed during the pollen season.

RESULTS

Groups were well balanced for age, gender, early and late skin response before treatment. Four children dropped out, in one case in relationship with active sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) administration. Chest and nose symptoms, as well as drug scores and VASs were significantly better in both the active or placebo SLIT+fluticasone (S+F) as compared to the control group (P between <0.001 and 0.043). Eye symptoms were significantly better in the active S+F group as compared to control (P=0.025). The VASs were significantly better in the active S+F group as compared to the placebo S+F group (P=0.037). The early skin response decreased significantly in the active S+F group (P<0.001), whereas the late skin response changed significantly in all groups, with an increase in the placebo+fluticasone group (P=0.019) and in the control group (P=0.037) and a decrease (P<0.0001) in the active S+F group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical efficacy of S+F is equal to that of fluticasone alone, but the addition of SLIT has effects also on non-bronchial symptoms.

摘要

相似文献

1
Impact of sublingual immunotherapy on seasonal asthma and skin reactivity in children allergic to Parietaria pollen treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Dec;33(12):1641-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2003.01809.x.
2
Double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy with standardized Parietaria judaica extract in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.标准化墙草提取物舌下含服-吞咽免疫疗法治疗儿童变应性鼻结膜炎的双盲安慰剂对照评估
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):425-32. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70388-x.
3
A meta-analysis of sublingual allergen immunotherapy and pharmacotherapy in pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.舌下变应原免疫疗法与药物疗法治疗花粉诱发的季节性变应性鼻结膜炎的荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2014 May 1;12:71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-71.
4
Rush sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria allergic patients.对墙草属过敏患者进行速发型舌下免疫疗法。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 Jul-Aug;24(4):146-51.
5
Clinical efficacy and safety of preseasonal sublingual immunotherapy with grass pollen carbamylated allergoid in rhinitic patients. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study.季节性过敏性鼻炎患者使用草花粉氨甲酰化类变应原进行舌下免疫治疗的临床疗效和安全性。一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2006 Sep-Oct;34(5):194-8. doi: 10.1157/13094026.
6
Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized olive pollen extract in pediatric patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma due to olive pollen sensitization.对因橄榄花粉致敏而患有变应性鼻结膜炎和轻度哮喘的儿科患者,采用标准化橄榄花粉提取物进行舌下免疫疗法的双盲、安慰剂对照评估。
Allergy. 1998 Jul;53(7):662-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03952.x.
7
Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing fluticasone aqueous nasal spray in mono-therapy, fluticasone plus cetirizine, fluticasone plus montelukast and cetirizine plus montelukast for seasonal allergic rhinitis.一项随机安慰剂对照试验,比较氟替卡松水性鼻喷雾剂单药治疗、氟替卡松加西替利嗪、氟替卡松加孟鲁司特以及西替利嗪加孟鲁司特治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的效果。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Feb;34(2):259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01877.x.
8
Possible relationship between systemic side effects and sensitization to rPar j 2 in allergic patients submitted to an ultra-rush (20 min) sublingual immunotherapy and selected by component resolved diagnosis.在接受超快速(20分钟)舌下免疫治疗并经组分解析诊断筛选的过敏患者中,全身副作用与对rPar j 2致敏之间的可能关系。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005 Oct;138(2):105-10. doi: 10.1159/000088431. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
9
Once daily intranasal fluticasone propionate (200 micrograms) reduces nasal symptoms and inflammation but also attenuates the increase in bronchial responsiveness during the pollen season in allergic rhinitis.每日一次鼻内使用丙酸氟替卡松(200微克)可减轻鼻部症状和炎症,同时还能减轻变应性鼻炎患者在花粉季节期间支气管反应性的增加。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Aug;98(2):274-82. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70150-1.
10
Long-term comparison of sublingual immunotherapy vs inhaled budesonide in patients with mild persistent asthma due to grass pollen.舌下免疫疗法与吸入布地奈德治疗草花粉所致轻度持续性哮喘患者的长期比较
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Jan;102(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60111-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.哮喘的舌下免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):CD011293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011293.pub3.
2
EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide.EAACI 过敏原免疫治疗用户指南。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 May;31 Suppl 25(Suppl 25):1-101. doi: 10.1111/pai.13189.
3
Parietaria Allergy: An Intriguing Challenge for the Allergist.墙草属植物过敏:过敏症专科医生面临的一个有趣挑战。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2018 Dec 7;54(6):106. doi: 10.3390/medicina54060106.
4
Sublingual allergen immunotherapy for respiratory allergy: a systematic review.舌下变应原免疫疗法治疗呼吸道过敏:一项系统评价。
Drugs Context. 2018 Nov 5;7:212552. doi: 10.7573/dic.212552. eCollection 2018.
5
The future outlook on allergen immunotherapy in children: 2018 and beyond.儿童变应原免疫治疗的未来展望:2018 年及以后。
Ital J Pediatr. 2018 Jul 11;44(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13052-018-0519-4.
6
Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review.既往关于免疫疗法的系统评价证据在儿童哮喘治疗当前实践中的适用性:一项GRADE(推荐分级的评估、制定与评价)系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 28;7(12):e016326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016326.
7
Allergen immunotherapy in asthma; what is new?哮喘的变应原免疫疗法;有哪些新进展?
Asthma Res Pract. 2015 Jul 15;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s40733-015-0006-2. eCollection 2015.
8
Allergen specific sublingual immunotherapy in children with asthma and allergic rhinitis.变应原特异性舌下免疫治疗在哮喘和变应性鼻炎患儿中的应用。
World J Pediatr. 2016 Aug;12(3):283-290. doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0022-1. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.哮喘的舌下免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 28;2015(8):CD011293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011293.pub2.
10
Allergen-specific immunotherapy for pediatric asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis: a systematic review.变应原特异性免疫疗法治疗儿童哮喘和鼻结膜炎:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):1155-67. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0343. Epub 2013 May 6.