Suppr超能文献

为什么女性被诊断为边缘型的比男性多?

Why are women diagnosed borderline more than men?

作者信息

Skodol Andrew E, Bender Donna S

机构信息

Department of Personality Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Box 121, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Q. 2003 Winter;74(4):349-60. doi: 10.1023/a:1026087410516.

Abstract

DSM-IV-TR states that borderline personality disorder (BPD) is "diagnosed predominantly (about 75%) in females." A 3:1 female to male gender ratio is quite pronounced for a mental disorder and, consequently, has led to speculation about its cause and to some empirical research. The essential question is whether the higher rate of BPD observed in women is a result of a sampling or diagnostic bias, or is it a reflection of biological or sociocultural differences between women and men? Data to address these issues are reviewed. The differential gender prevalence of BPD in clinical settings appears to be largely a function of sampling bias. True prevalence by gender is unknown. The modest empirical support for diagnostic biases of various kinds would not account for a wide difference in prevalence between the genders. Biological and sociocultural factors provide potentially illuminating hypotheses, should the true prevalence of BPD differ by gender.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版,修订版》(DSM-IV-TR)指出,边缘型人格障碍(BPD)“主要在女性中被诊断出来(约占75%)”。对于一种精神障碍来说,3:1的女性与男性性别比相当显著,因此引发了对其病因的猜测以及一些实证研究。关键问题在于,在女性中观察到的较高的边缘型人格障碍发病率是抽样或诊断偏差的结果,还是男女之间生物学或社会文化差异的反映?本文对解决这些问题的数据进行了综述。在临床环境中,边缘型人格障碍不同的性别患病率似乎很大程度上是抽样偏差的作用。按性别划分的真实患病率尚不清楚。对各种诊断偏差的适度实证支持并不能解释不同性别之间患病率的巨大差异。如果边缘型人格障碍的真实患病率因性别而异,生物学和社会文化因素提供了可能具有启发性的假设。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验