Van Voorhees Benjamin W, Cooper Lisa A, Rost Kathryn M, Nutting Paul, Rubenstein Lisa V, Meredith Lisa, Wang Nae-Yuh, Ford Daniel E
Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.21060.x.
This study examined whether depressed patients treated exclusively in primary care report less need for care and less acceptability of treatment options than those depressed patients treated in the specialty mental health setting after up to 6 months of treatment.
Cross-sectional study.
Forty-five community primary care practices.
A total of 881 persons with major depression who had received mental health services in the previous 6 months and who enrolled in 3 of the 4 Quality Improvement for Depression Collaboration Studies.
Patients were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: 1) having received mental health services exclusively from a primary care provider (45%), or 2) having received any services from a mental health specialist (55%) in the previous 6 months. Compared with patients who received care from mental health specialists, patients who received mental health services exclusively from primary care providers had 2.7-fold the odds (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 4.4) of reporting that no treatment was definitely acceptable and had 2.4-fold the odds (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.9) of reporting that evidence-based treatment options (antidepressant medication) were definitely not acceptable. These results were adjusted for demographic, social/behavioral, depression severity, and economic factors using multiple logistic regression analysis.
Patients with depression treated exclusively by primary care providers have attitudes and beliefs more averse to care than those seen by mental health specialists. These differences in attitudes and beliefs may contribute to lower quality depression care observed in comparisons of primary care and specialty mental health providers.
本研究调查了仅在初级保健机构接受治疗的抑郁症患者与在专科心理健康机构接受治疗的抑郁症患者相比,在长达6个月的治疗后,是否报告对护理的需求更少以及对治疗方案的接受度更低。
横断面研究。
45个社区初级保健机构。
共有881名重度抑郁症患者,他们在过去6个月内接受过心理健康服务,并参加了4项抑郁症协作质量改进研究中的3项。
患者被分为两组中的一组:1)在过去6个月内仅从初级保健提供者处接受心理健康服务(45%),或2)在过去6个月内从心理健康专科医生处接受过任何服务(55%)。与接受心理健康专科医生护理的患者相比,仅从初级保健提供者处接受心理健康服务的患者报告没有绝对可接受的治疗的几率高2.7倍(95%置信区间[CI],1.6至4.4),报告循证治疗方案(抗抑郁药物)绝对不可接受的几率高2.4倍(95%CI,1.5至3.9)。使用多重逻辑回归分析对人口统计学、社会/行为、抑郁严重程度和经济因素进行了调整。
仅由初级保健提供者治疗的抑郁症患者比心理健康专科医生治疗的患者对护理的态度和信念更反感。这些态度和信念上的差异可能导致在比较初级保健和专科心理健康提供者时观察到的抑郁症护理质量较低。