Swennen Gwen R J, Grimaldi Hannes, Upheber Juliane, Kramer Franz-Josef, Dempf Rupert
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
J Craniofac Surg. 2004 Jan;15(1):158-64; discussion 164. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200401000-00038.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate nasalance measures in German-speaking patients with different types of repaired cleft lip and palate and to find out if significant nasalance gender differences exist in the different cleft groups. A total of 125 German-speaking cleft patients (74 male and 51 female) were included in this study: 18 patients with isolated unilateral cleft lip (UCL; mean age: 13.00 +/- 2.03 years), 66 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP; mean age: 14.80 +/- 3.45 years), 25 patients with isolated cleft palate (CP; mean age: 14.60 +/- 3.48 years), and 16 patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP; mean age: 14.30 +/- 3.61 years). Nasalance data were collected and computed using the NasalView hardware/software system (Fa. Tiger Electronics, Seattle, WA). Speech stimuli according to a modified Heidelberg Rhinophonia Assessment Form (sustained vowels "a," "e," "i," "o," and "u"; oral and nasal sentences; and three oral-nasal reading passages) were used to obtain nasalance scores. Nasalance distance and ratio were also calculated for the oral and nasal sentences and for one of the oral-nasal reading passages. Unpaired t tests showed no significant gender nasalance differences in each cleft group. Analysis of variance showed no significant differences in mean nasalance distance and ratio. For the nasal sentence, a significant difference (P = 0.032) in mean nasalance scores was found between the UCL and UCLP groups.
本研究的目的是评估不同类型唇腭裂修复后的德语患者的鼻漏气测量值,并探究不同腭裂组中鼻漏气是否存在显著的性别差异。本研究共纳入125名说德语的腭裂患者(74名男性和51名女性):18名单纯性单侧唇裂(UCL)患者(平均年龄:13.00±2.03岁),66名完全性单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者(平均年龄:14.80±3.45岁),25名单纯腭裂(CP)患者(平均年龄:14.60±3.48岁),以及16名完全性双侧唇腭裂(BCLP)患者(平均年龄:14.30±3.61岁)。使用NasalView硬件/软件系统(华盛顿州西雅图市Tiger Electronics公司)收集并计算鼻漏气数据。根据改良的海德堡鼻音评估表(持续元音“a”“e”“i”“o”和“u”;口腔和鼻腔句子;以及三篇口鼻阅读段落)的语音刺激来获得鼻漏气分数。还计算了口腔和鼻腔句子以及其中一篇口鼻阅读段落的鼻漏气距离和比率。独立样本t检验显示,每个腭裂组中鼻漏气不存在显著的性别差异。方差分析显示,平均鼻漏气距离和比率没有显著差异。对于鼻腔句子,UCL组和UCLP组之间的平均鼻漏气分数存在显著差异(P = 0.032)。