Suppr超能文献

基于从完整质体基因组序列推断出的基因丢失的分支分析的质体系统发育。

Phylogeny of plastids based on cladistic analysis of gene loss inferred from complete plastid genome sequences.

作者信息

Nozaki Hisayoshi, Ohta Njij, Matsuzaki Motomichi, Misumi Osami, Kuroiwa Tsuneyoshi

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

出版信息

J Mol Evol. 2003 Oct;57(4):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00239-003-2486-6.

Abstract

Based on the recent hypothesis on the origin of eukaryotic phototrophs, red algae, green plants, and glaucophytes constitute the "primary photosynthetic eukaryotes" (whose plastids may have originated directly from a cyanobacterium-like prokaryote via primary endosymbiosis), whereas the plastids of other lineages of eukaryotic phototrophs appear to be the result of secondary or tertiary endosymbiotic events (involving a phototrophic eukaryote and a host cell). Although phylogenetic analyses using multiple plastid genes from a wide range of eukaryotic lineages have been carried out, some of the major phylogenetic relationships of plastids remain ambiguous or conflict between different phylogenetic methods used for nucleotide or amino acid substitutions. Therefore, an alternative methodology to infer the plastid phylogeny is needed. Here, we carried out a cladistic analysis of the "loss of plastid genes" after primary endosymbiosis using complete plastid genome sequences from a wide range of eukaryotic phototrophs. Since it is extremely unlikely that plastid genes are regained during plastid evolution, we used the irreversible Camin-Sokal model for our cladistic analysis of the loss of plastid genes. The cladistic analysis of the 274 plastid protein-coding genes resolved the 20 operational taxonomic units representing a wide range of eukaryotic lineages (including three secondary plastid-containing groups) into two large monophyletic groups with high bootstrap values: one corresponded to the red lineage and the other consisted of a large clade composed of the green lineage (green plants and Euglena) and the basal glaucophyte plastid. Although the sister relationship between the green lineage and the Glaucophyta was not resolved in recent phylogenetic studies using amino acid substitutions from multiple plastid genes, it is consistent with the rbcL gene phylogeny and with a recent phylogenetic study using multiple nuclear genes. In addition, our analysis robustly resolved the conflicting/ambiguous phylogenetic positions of secondary plastids in previous phylogenetic studies: the Euglena plastid was sister to the chlorophycean (Chlamydomonas) lineage, and the secondary plastids from the diatom (Odontiella) and cryptophyte (Guillardia) were monophyletic within the red lineage.

摘要

基于近期关于真核光合生物起源的假说,红藻、绿色植物和灰胞藻构成了“主要光合真核生物”(其质体可能通过初级内共生直接起源于类似蓝细菌的原核生物),而其他真核光合生物谱系的质体似乎是次级或三级内共生事件的结果(涉及一个光合真核生物和一个宿主细胞)。尽管已经使用来自广泛真核生物谱系的多个质体基因进行了系统发育分析,但质体的一些主要系统发育关系在用于核苷酸或氨基酸替换的不同系统发育方法之间仍然模糊不清或存在冲突。因此,需要一种推断质体系统发育的替代方法。在这里,我们使用来自广泛真核光合生物的完整质体基因组序列,对初级内共生后“质体基因的丢失”进行了分支分析。由于质体基因在质体进化过程中重新获得的可能性极小,我们在质体基因丢失的分支分析中使用了不可逆的卡明 - 索卡尔模型。对274个质体蛋白质编码基因的分支分析将代表广泛真核生物谱系的20个操作分类单元(包括三个含有次级质体的类群)解析为两个具有高自展值的大单系类群:一个对应红系,另一个由一个大分支组成,该分支由绿系(绿色植物和眼虫)和基部灰胞藻质体组成。尽管在最近使用多个质体基因的氨基酸替换进行的系统发育研究中,绿系和灰胞藻之间的姐妹关系尚未得到解决,但它与rbcL基因系统发育以及最近使用多个核基因的系统发育研究一致。此外,我们的分析有力地解决了先前系统发育研究中次级质体相互冲突/模糊的系统发育位置:眼虫质体是绿藻纲(衣藻)谱系的姐妹,硅藻(齿缘藻)和隐藻(吉氏藻)的次级质体在红系内是单系的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验