• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近视患者LASIK术后夜间视力问题的危险因素。

Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.

作者信息

Pop Mihai, Payette Yves

机构信息

Michel Pop Clinics, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan;111(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.022
PMID:14711706
Abstract

PURPOSE

To study the preoperative risk factors for night vision complaints (NVCs) after LASIK in a clinical setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Seven hundred ninety-five patients (1488 eyes) who underwent LASIK for myopia up to -9.75 diopters (D) (from January 1 to December 31, 1999).

SETTING

Private clinic.

METHODS

A complete preoperative examination was performed. Patients had bilateral LASIK surgery using the Nidek EC-5000 non-wavefront guided slit-scanning excimer laser and the Moria LSK One microkeratome. Patients were observed postoperatively for 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The reported NVCs for each eye were rated on a subjective scale based on functional visual comfort. Clinically important NVC odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Reports of NVCs decreased considerably from 25.6% at 1 month to 4.7% at 12 months postoperatively, at which time all patients reported similar NVCs in both eyes. Stratification of risk factors at 12 months postoperatively showed a 2.8-times increase in NVCs for initial myopia of >5 D, a 2.5-times increase for an optical zone of </=6.0 mm, and a 2.9-times increase for a postoperative spherical equivalent outside +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. The role of attempted spherical correction, age of the patient, and postoperative spherical equivalent had significant importance in logistic regression of the OR throughout the first postoperative year. In a stepwise logistic regression using 6- and 12-month data, attempted spherical correction and optical zone were the most predictive factors of NVCs (P<0.001). Pupil size at any month postoperatively was not statistically predictive of postoperative NVCs in any differential model involving it.

CONCLUSIONS

Attempted degree of spherical correction, age, optical zone, and postoperative spherical equivalent were major risk factors of NVCs throughout the first postoperative year, whereas pupil size was not. Future wavefront studies that characterize higher order aberrations might be helpful for understanding individual visual aberrations while predicting quality of vision.

摘要

目的

在临床环境中研究准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后出现夜间视力问题(NVCs)的术前危险因素。

设计

回顾性非对照病例系列。

参与者

1999年1月1日至12月31日期间接受LASIK治疗近视度数达-9.75屈光度(D)的795例患者(1488只眼)。

地点

私人诊所。

方法

进行全面的术前检查。患者使用Nidek EC - 5000非波前引导裂隙扫描准分子激光和Moria LSK One微型角膜刀接受双眼LASIK手术。术后对患者进行12个月的观察。

主要观察指标

根据功能性视觉舒适度,对每只眼报告的NVCs进行主观评分。计算具有临床意义的NVC优势比(ORs)。

结果

NVCs的报告率从术后1个月时的25.6%大幅下降至12个月时的4.7%,此时所有患者双眼的NVCs报告相似。术后12个月对危险因素进行分层分析显示,初始近视度数>5 D时NVCs增加2.8倍,光学区≤6.0 mm时增加2.5倍,术后球镜等效度在正视眼±0.5 D范围之外时增加2.9倍。在术后第一年的OR逻辑回归中,尝试的球镜矫正、患者年龄和术后球镜等效度的作用具有显著意义。在使用6个月和12个月数据进行的逐步逻辑回归中,尝试的球镜矫正和光学区是NVCs最具预测性的因素(P<0.001)。在任何涉及术后瞳孔大小的差异模型中,术后任何月份的瞳孔大小对术后NVCs均无统计学预测意义。

结论

在术后第一年,尝试的球镜矫正度数、年龄、光学区和术后球镜等效度是NVCs的主要危险因素,而瞳孔大小不是。未来表征高阶像差的波前研究可能有助于在预测视力质量时理解个体视觉像差。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.近视患者LASIK术后夜间视力问题的危险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan;111(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.022.
2
Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia.准分子原位角膜磨镶术矫正近视后的功能结果及患者满意度
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Oct;31(10):1943-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.022.
3
Pupil size and night vision disturbances after LASIK for myopia.近视患者LASIK术后的瞳孔大小与夜间视力障碍
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004 Aug;82(4):454-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1395-3907.2004.00278.x.
4
Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations.使用Zyoptix 3.1系统进行波前引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视和复合性近视散光并随访1年:临床结果及高阶像差变化
Ophthalmology. 2004 Dec;111(12):2175-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.027.
5
Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.上皮瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(Epi-LASIK)与非上皮瓣Epi-LASIK治疗中低度近视的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.025.
6
The role of the mesopic pupil on patient-reported outcomes in young patients with myopia 1 month after wavefront-guided LASIK.波前引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后1个月,中瞳孔对年轻近视患者报告的结局的作用。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Mar;30(3):159-65. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140217-02.
7
Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后的瞳孔大小与视力质量
Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1606-14. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00494-9.
8
Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.波前引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与传统LASIK治疗中度近视后夜间驾驶性能的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.038.
9
Corneal wavefront-guided retreatments for significant night vision symptoms after myopic laser refractive surgery.近视激光屈光手术后严重夜间视力症状的角膜波前引导再治疗
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;145(1):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.025. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
10
Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters.对高达-10屈光度近视患者进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术的十年随访。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;145(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Pupil Size and Angle Kappa in Refractive Surgery: A Population-Based Epidemiological Study in Predominantly American Caucasians.屈光手术中瞳孔大小和角kappa的评估:一项以美国白种人为主的人群流行病学研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 23;15(8):e43998. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43998. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Comparison of visual quality after SMILE correction of low-to-moderate myopia in different optical zones.不同光学区 SMILE 矫正低中度近视术后视觉质量比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;43(10):3623-3632. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02771-6. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
3
The dynamic changes and influencing factors of visual symptoms after small incision lenticule extraction.
小切口微透镜取出术后视觉症状的动态变化及影响因素。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 May 19;23(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02964-8.
4
The Effect of Age, Postoperative Refraction, and Pre- and Postoperative Pupil Size on Halo Size and Intensity in Eyes Implanted with a Trifocal or Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens.年龄、术后屈光状态以及术前和术后瞳孔大小对植入三焦点或扩展景深人工晶状体眼的光晕大小和强度的影响
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 14;15:4141-4152. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S327660. eCollection 2021.
5
Customized eye modeling for optical quality assessment in myopic femto-LASIK surgery.定制眼模型用于近视飞秒 LASIK 手术中的光学质量评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 6;11(1):16049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95730-z.
6
A Novel Approach to Enhancement Linked Laser Asymmetric Keratectomy Using Semi-Cylindrical Ablation Pattern in Patients with Myopic Regression After Laser Refractive Surgery.一种在激光屈光手术后近视回退患者中使用半圆柱形消融模式增强型连锁激光角膜切削术的新方法。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 23;15:1751-1758. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S306636. eCollection 2021.
7
The differences of corneal astigmatism in different populations and its quantitative analysis.不同人群角膜散光的差异及其定量分析。
Afr Health Sci. 2020 Jun;20(2):775-778. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i2.30.
8
Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)后角膜帽大小的评估。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;257(12):2789-2793. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04481-1. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
Effect of age on visual and refractive results after LASIK: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser.年龄对LASIK术后视力和屈光结果的影响:机械微型角膜刀与飞秒激光的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 18;12(3):488-495. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.03.21. eCollection 2019.
10
Effect of age on visual and refractive results after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) with adjuvant use of mitomycin C.年龄对辅助使用丝裂霉素C的准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)后视力和屈光结果的影响。
J Optom. 2019 Apr-Jun;12(2):92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Mar 18.