Suppr超能文献

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后的瞳孔大小与视力质量

Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK.

作者信息

Schallhorn Steven C, Kaupp Sandor E, Tanzer David J, Tidwell Jim, Laurent John, Bourque Linda B

机构信息

Department of Opthalmology, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California 92134-5000, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1606-14. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00494-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors related to the quality of vision after LASIK.

DESIGN

Survey study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred consecutive patients.

INTERVENTION

LASIK with a 6.0-mm elliptical ablation pattern without transition zone to treat mild to moderate myopia or astigmatism (preoperative manifest spherical equivalent [MSE], -4.79 +/- 1.33 diopters [D]; range, -2.88 to -9.25 D). The second eye was treated 1 month after the first.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Completed questionnaires assessing night vision problems (glare, haze, and halo symptoms) before surgery and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery in 97, 75, 81, and 66 subjects, respectively. Mesopic pupil size and preoperative and postoperative variables were analyzed with questionnaire data using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with large mesopic pupils had significantly more reports of glare, haze, and halo than did those with smaller pupils in the treated eye at 1 month after surgery (P=0.02, P=0.03, and P=0.02, respectively ANOVA) and of glare at 3 months (P=0.05). Significant predictors of symptoms at 6 months, identified through multivariate regression analysis, included preoperative MSE (for glare and haze), preoperative contrast acuity (glare), postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA; haze), and residual cylinder (haze). Together, these factors accounted for only 19% of the overall variability in glare and 37% of the variability in haze responses. No relationship between pupils and symptoms was noted at 6 months after surgery in either the ANOVA or regression analysis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with large pupils had more quality of vision symptoms in the early postoperative period, but no correlation was observed 6 months after surgery. Factors related to long-term symptoms include the level of treatment (preoperative myopia), preoperative contrast acuity, postoperative UCVA, and residual cylinder. Most of the variability in visual quality could not be explained by preoperative or clinical outcome measures, including pupil size.

摘要

目的

评估与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后视力质量相关的因素。

设计

调查研究。

参与者

连续100例患者。

干预

采用6.0毫米椭圆形消融模式且无过渡区的LASIK治疗轻度至中度近视或散光(术前明显球镜等效值[MSE],-4.79±1.33屈光度[D];范围,-2.88至-9.25 D)。第二只眼在第一只眼术后1个月进行治疗。

主要观察指标

分别对97、75、81和66名受试者在手术前以及术后1、3和6个月完成的问卷进行评估,问卷内容涉及夜间视力问题(眩光、雾状混浊和光晕症状)。使用方差分析(ANOVA)和多元回归分析,对中视瞳孔大小以及术前和术后变量与问卷数据进行分析。

结果

术后1个月时,治疗眼的中视瞳孔较大的患者比瞳孔较小的患者出现眩光、雾状混浊和光晕的报告明显更多(分别为P = 0.02、P = 0.03和P = 0.02,ANOVA),术后3个月时出现眩光的情况也是如此(P = 0.05)。通过多元回归分析确定的术后6个月症状的显著预测因素包括术前MSE(针对眩光和雾状混浊)、术前对比敏感度视力(眩光)、术后未矫正视力(UCVA;雾状混浊)和残余柱镜度(雾状混浊)。这些因素共同仅占眩光总体变异性的19%和雾状混浊反应变异性的37%。在ANOVA或回归分析组中,术后6个月均未发现瞳孔与症状之间存在关联。

结论

瞳孔较大的患者在术后早期出现更多视力质量症状,但术后6个月未观察到相关性。与长期症状相关的因素包括治疗水平(术前近视)、术前对比敏感度视力、术后UCVA和残余柱镜度。视力质量的大部分变异性无法通过术前或临床结果指标(包括瞳孔大小)来解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验