Jinsmaa Yunden, Okada Yoshio, Tsuda Yuko, Shiotani Kimitaka, Sasaki Yusuke, Ambo Akihiro, Bryant Sharon D, Lazarus Lawrence H
Medicinal Chemistry Group, Laboratory of Computational Biology and Risk Analysis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Apr;309(1):432-8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.060061. Epub 2004 Jan 12.
Novel bioactive opioid mimetic agonists containing 2',6'-dimethyl-l-tyrosine (Dmt) and a pyrazinone ring interact with mu- and delta-opioid receptors. Compound 1 [3-(4' -Dmt-aminobutyl)-6-(3'-Dmt-aminopropyl)-5-methyl-2(1H)pyrazinone] exhibited high mu-opioid receptor affinity and selectivity (K(i)mu = 0.021 nM and K(i)delta/K(i)mu = 1,519, respectively), and agonist activity on guinea pig ileum (IC(50) = 1.7 nM) with weaker delta-bioactivity on mouse vas deferens (IC(50) = 25.8 nM). Other compounds (2-4) had mu-opioid receptor affinities and selectivities 2- to 5-fold and 4- to 7-fold less than 1, respectively. Intracerebroventricular administration of 1 in mice exhibited potent naloxone reversible antinociception (65 to 71 times greater than morphine) in both tail-flick (TF) and hot-plate (HP) tests. Distinct opioid antagonists had differential effects on antinociception: naltrindole (delta-antagonist) partially blocked antinociception in the TF, but it was ineffective in the HP test, whereas beta-funaltrexamine (irreversible antagonist, mu(1)/mu(2)-subtypes) but not naloxonazine (mu(1)-subtype) inhibited TF test antinociception, yet both blocked antinociception in the HP test. Our data indicated that 1 acted through mu- and delta-opioid receptors to produce spinal antinociception, although primarily through the mu(2)-receptor subtype; however, the mu(1)-receptor subtype dominates supraspinally. Subcutaneous and oral administration indicated that 1 crossed gastrointestinal and blood-brain barriers to produce central nervous system-mediated antinociception. Furthermore, daily s.c. dosing of mice with 1 for 1 week developed tolerance in a similar manner to that of morphine in TF and HP tests, implicating that 1 also acts through a similar mechanism analogous to morphine at mu-opioid receptors.
含有2',6'-二甲基-L-酪氨酸(Dmt)和吡嗪酮环的新型生物活性阿片样物质模拟激动剂与μ-和δ-阿片受体相互作用。化合物1 [3-(4'-Dmt-氨基丁基)-6-(3'-Dmt-氨基丙基)-5-甲基-2(1H)吡嗪酮]表现出高μ-阿片受体亲和力和选择性(K(i)μ = 0.021 nM,K(i)δ/K(i)μ分别为1,519),以及对豚鼠回肠的激动剂活性(IC(50) = 1.7 nM),对小鼠输精管的δ-生物活性较弱(IC(50) = 25.8 nM)。其他化合物(2 - 4)的μ-阿片受体亲和力和选择性分别比化合物1低2至5倍和4至7倍。在小鼠脑室内注射化合物1在甩尾(TF)和热板(HP)试验中均表现出强效的纳洛酮可逆性抗伤害感受作用(比吗啡强65至71倍)。不同的阿片拮抗剂对抗伤害感受有不同的影响:纳曲吲哚(δ-拮抗剂)部分阻断TF试验中的抗伤害感受,但在HP试验中无效,而β-氟奈曲胺(不可逆拮抗剂,μ(1)/μ(2)亚型)而非纳洛嗪(μ(1)亚型)抑制TF试验中的抗伤害感受,但两者均阻断HP试验中的抗伤害感受。我们的数据表明,化合物1通过μ-和δ-阿片受体发挥作用以产生脊髓抗伤害感受,尽管主要通过μ(2)受体亚型;然而,μ(1)受体亚型在脊髓上占主导地位。皮下和口服给药表明,化合物1穿过胃肠道和血脑屏障以产生中枢神经系统介导的抗伤害感受。此外,在TF和HP试验中,每天给小鼠皮下注射化合物1持续1周会产生与吗啡类似的耐受性,这意味着化合物1在μ-阿片受体上也通过与吗啡类似的机制发挥作用。