Suppr超能文献

通过两种不同剂量测量吲哚菁绿血浆消失率。

Measurement of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate by two different dosages.

作者信息

Sakka Samir G, Koeck Heiko, Meier-Hellmann Andreas

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Bachstrasse 18, 07740 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):506-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2091-6. Epub 2004 Jan 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While using a transcutaneous system for assessment of liver function by indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) in critically ill patients, we compared the agreement between ICG-PDR obtained by the recommended standard ICG dosage (0.5 mg/kg) and a reduced dosage (0.25 mg/kg).

DESIGN

Clinical study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Critically ill patients ( n=16, 5 female, 11 male) who underwent liver function monitoring by ICG-PDR for clinical indication.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 31 pairs of ICG-PDR measurements by applying the recommended dosage (0.5 mg/kg, ICG-PDR(0.5)) and a reduced dosage (0.25 mg/kg, ICG-PDR(0.25)). For each comparative measurement either first 0.5 mg/kg or 0.25 mg/kg of ICG was injected in a random fashion and followed by the corresponding dosage 60 min later. All patients were sedated and mechanically ventilated via a tracheal tube. Each patient was monitored by an ICG finger clip which was connected to a liver function monitoring system (LiMon, Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany). ICG-PDR(0.25) was 2.7-25.0 %/min and ICG-PDR(0.5) 4.5-24.5 %/min, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed ICG-PDR(0.25)=1.13.ICG-PDR(0.5)-0.66 %/min (r=0.95, p<0.0001) with a mean bias 1.0 %/min (standard deviation 2.5 %/min). The 15 min residual rates were also highly correlated ( r=0.92, p<0.0001) with a mean bias of 0.3%.

CONCLUSION

A reduced dosage of ICG (0.25 mg/kg) is sufficiently accurate for transcutaneous measurement of ICG-PDR in critically ill patients.

摘要

目的

在使用经皮系统通过吲哚菁绿血浆消失率(ICG-PDR)评估危重症患者肝功能时,我们比较了推荐标准ICG剂量(0.5mg/kg)和减量剂量(0.25mg/kg)所获得的ICG-PDR之间的一致性。

设计

临床研究。

地点

一所大学医院的重症监护病房。

患者

因临床指征接受ICG-PDR肝功能监测的危重症患者(n = 16,女性5例,男性11例)。

测量与结果

我们分析了31对ICG-PDR测量值,分别采用推荐剂量(0.5mg/kg,ICG-PDR(0.5))和减量剂量(0.25mg/kg,ICG-PDR(0.25))。对于每次比较测量,随机先注射0.5mg/kg或0.25mg/kg的ICG,60分钟后注射相应剂量。所有患者均接受镇静并通过气管插管进行机械通气。每位患者通过连接到肝功能监测系统(LiMon,德国普升医疗系统公司)的ICG指夹进行监测。ICG-PDR(0.25)分别为2.7 - 25.0%/分钟,ICG-PDR(0.5)为4.5 - 24.5%/分钟。线性回归分析显示ICG-PDR(0.25)=1.13·ICG-PDR(0.5) - 0.66%/分钟(r = 0.95,p < 0.0001),平均偏差为1.0%/分钟(标准差2.5%/分钟)。15分钟残留率也高度相关(r = 0.92,p < 0.0001),平均偏差为0.3%。

结论

减量的ICG剂量(0.25mg/kg)对于危重症患者经皮测量ICG-PDR具有足够的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验