Suppr超能文献

使用不同自动乳酸分析仪测量血乳酸浓度对血乳酸转变阈值的影响。

Effect of measuring blood lactate concentrations using different automated lactate analysers on blood lactate transition thresholds.

作者信息

Buckley J D, Bourdon P C, Woolford S M

机构信息

Centre for Research in Education and Sports Science, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Underdale, South Australia.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2003 Dec;6(4):408-21. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(03)80267-0.

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of using three automated blood lactate analysers (Accusport, Lactate Pro, YSI 1500 Sport) on blood lactate transition thresholds (BLTT). Blood lactate concentrations were measured using the three analysers in rowers (n = 17) and kayakers (n = 6) during incremental exercise. The BLTT determined were: 1) ADAPT lactate threshold (data point preceding lactate increase of > or = 0.4 mmol x l(-1)), 2) log-log lactate threshold (point of lactate increase when log lactate plotted against log of relevant exercise parameter), 3) DMAX anaerobic threshold, 4) ADAPT anaerobic threshold (modified DMAX method), 5) Onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA, fixed blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol x l(-1)). Measurements of blood lactate concentration differed between analysers (p < 0.0001), resulting in BLTT differing between analysers when expressed as a blood lactate concentration (p < 0.0001), or when the BLTT was defined as a fixed blood lactate concentration (e.g. OBLA) (p < 0.0001). When expressed as a power output or heart rate using BLTT based on relative changes in lactate concentration (log-log, ADAPT and DMAX thresholds) the values were similar between analysers (p > 0.05), except the Accusport provided higher values for the log-log lactate threshold (p < 0.0001). We concluded that, despite providing significantly different lactate concentrations, unless the Accusport was used to determine the log-log lactate threshold, or values were expressed as a blood lactate concentration, the use of different analysers had little effect on the BLTT.

摘要

本研究调查了使用三种自动血乳酸分析仪(Accusport、Lactate Pro、YSI 1500 Sport)对血乳酸转换阈值(BLTT)的影响。在递增运动期间,使用这三种分析仪对赛艇运动员(n = 17)和皮划艇运动员(n = 6)的血乳酸浓度进行了测量。所测定的血乳酸转换阈值包括:1)适应性乳酸阈值(乳酸增加≥0.4 mmol·L⁻¹之前的数据点),2)对数-对数乳酸阈值(当将乳酸对数与相关运动参数对数作图时乳酸增加的点),3)DMAX无氧阈值,4)适应性无氧阈值(改良DMAX方法),5)血乳酸积累起始点(OBLA,固定血乳酸浓度为4 mmol·L⁻¹)。各分析仪之间的血乳酸浓度测量值存在差异(p < 0.0001),这导致以血乳酸浓度表示时各分析仪的血乳酸转换阈值不同(p < 0.0001),或者当血乳酸转换阈值定义为固定血乳酸浓度(如OBLA)时也不同(p < 0.0001)。当基于乳酸浓度的相对变化(对数-对数、适应性和DMAX阈值)将血乳酸转换阈值表示为功率输出或心率时,各分析仪之间的值相似(p > 0.05),但Accusport提供的对数-对数乳酸阈值较高(p < 0.0001)。我们得出结论,尽管各分析仪提供的乳酸浓度存在显著差异,但除非使用Accusport来确定对数-对数乳酸阈值,或者将值表示为血乳酸浓度,否则使用不同的分析仪对血乳酸转换阈值影响不大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验