Li Siu Nam, Peeling Peter, Scott Brendan R, Peiffer Jeremiah J, Shaykevich Alex, Girard Olivier
School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sports Science), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Department of Sport Science, Western Australian Institute of Sport, Mount Claremont, Western Australia, Australia.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Jan;25(1):e12204. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12204. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
The effects of acute hypoxic exposure on mechanical output and internal responses during cycling with heart rate (HR) clamped at lactate thresholds 1 and 2 (LT1 and LT2, respectively) were investigated. On separate days, 12 trained males cycled for 15 min at a clamped HR corresponding to LT1 and LT2 under normoxic or hypoxic conditions (simulated altitude of ∼3500 m and inspired oxygen fraction of 13.6%). Power output (PO), arterial oxygen saturation, ventilatory and perceptual responses were measured every 3 min, with metabolic response assessed pre- and post-exercise. At LT1, PO was consistently lower in hypoxia compared to normoxia (p < 0.01). At LT2, PO was not different between normoxia and hypoxia at 3 and 6 min (both p > 0.42) but was significantly lower in hypoxia at 9, 12 and 15 min (all p < 0.04). Overall, hypoxia induced a greater decrease in PO at LT1 (-33.3% ± 11.3%) than at LT2 (-18.0 ± 14.7%) compared to normoxia. Ventilatory, perceptual and metabolic responses were influenced by exercise intensity (all p < 0.01) but not environmental conditions (all p > 0.17). A simulated altitude of ∼3500 m is more effective in reducing cycling PO at LT1 than LT2 during HR clamped cycling while maintaining other internal loads. Therefore, normobaric hypoxia provides a greater benefit via a larger decrease in the mechanical constraints of exercise at lower exercise intensities.
研究了急性低氧暴露对心率(HR)分别维持在乳酸阈1(LT1)和乳酸阈2(LT2)时骑行过程中机械输出和机体内部反应的影响。在不同日期,12名受过训练的男性在常氧或低氧条件下(模拟海拔约3500米,吸入氧分数为13.6%),以对应LT1和LT2的钳制心率骑行15分钟。每3分钟测量一次功率输出(PO)、动脉血氧饱和度、通气和感知反应,并在运动前后评估代谢反应。在LT1时,与常氧相比,低氧状态下的PO持续较低(p < 0.01)。在LT2时,常氧和低氧状态下3分钟和6分钟时的PO无差异(均p > 0.42),但在9分钟、12分钟和15分钟时,低氧状态下的PO显著较低(均p < 0.04)。总体而言,与常氧相比,低氧在LT1时导致的PO下降幅度(-33.3% ± 11.3%)大于LT2时(-18.0 ± 14.7%)。通气、感知和代谢反应受运动强度影响(均p < 0.01),但不受环境条件影响(均p > 0.17)。在钳制心率骑行过程中,模拟海拔约3500米在维持其他机体内部负荷的同时,对降低LT1时的骑行PO比LT2时更有效。因此,在较低运动强度下,常压低氧通过更大程度降低运动的机械限制带来更大益处。