Ndyomugyenyi Richard, Magnussen Pascal, Clarke Siân
Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Jan;9(1):47-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01167.x.
We conducted an efficacy study of chloroquine (CQ), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and a combination of both (SP+CQ) for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in an area of low transmission with low drug pressure. On day 3, fever clearance was 97.4% (95% CI, 86.8-99.9), 100% (95% CI, 87.2-100) and 96.6% (95% CI, 82.2-99.9) in the CQ, SP and SP+CQ groups, respectively, (P=0.65). On day 14, clinical success was 92.5% (95% CI, 79.6-98.4), 100% (95% CI, 87.2-100) and 100% (95% CI, 88.1-100) in the CQ, SP and CQ+SP groups, respectively. Clinical failure was seen in 7.5% with 5% (95% CI, 0.61-16.9) early treatment failure and 2.5% (95% CI, 0.06-13.2) late treatment failure of cases in the CQ group and 0% in the SP and SP+CQ groups. Parasitological resistance was observed at RI level in 10% (95% CI, 2.8-23.7), 18.5% (95% CI, 6.3-38.1) and 6.9% (95% CI, 0.85-22.8) for the CQ, SP and SP+CQ, respectively (P=0.37). There was no age-dependent difference in clinical failure or parasitological resistance in any of the treatment groups and prior CQ use within the last 2 weeks did not affect CQ treatment outcome. The findings of this study suggest that CQ is still effective for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in this area of low transmission and SP. However, combination therapy of SP+CQ is recommended to delay the development SP resistance, and regular surveillance for emerging CQ and SP resistance is needed to plan for alternative antimalarial drug regimens.
我们在一个疟疾传播率低且药物压力小的地区,开展了一项关于氯喹(CQ)、周效磺胺-乙胺嘧啶(SP)以及二者联合用药(SP+CQ)治疗非复杂性疟疾的疗效研究。第3天,CQ组、SP组和SP+CQ组的发热清除率分别为97.4%(95%置信区间,86.8 - 99.9)、100%(95%置信区间,87.2 - 100)和96.6%(95%置信区间,82.2 - 99.9),(P = 0.65)。第14天,CQ组、SP组和CQ+SP组的临床成功率分别为92.5%(95%置信区间,79.6 - 98.4)、100%(95%置信区间,87.2 - 100)和100%(95%置信区间,88.1 - 100)。CQ组有7.5%出现临床失败,其中5%(95%置信区间,0.61 - 16.9)为早期治疗失败,2.5%(95%置信区间,0.06 - 13.2)为晚期治疗失败,而SP组和SP+CQ组均为0%出现临床失败。CQ组、SP组和SP+CQ组的寄生虫学耐药率分别为10%(95%置信区间,2.8 - 23.7)、18.5%(95%置信区间,6.3 - (此处原文有误,应改为38.1))和6.9%(95%置信区间,0.85 - 22.8),(P = 0.37)。各治疗组在临床失败或寄生虫学耐药方面均无年龄依赖性差异,且过去2周内曾使用过CQ并不影响CQ的治疗效果。本研究结果表明,在这个低传播地区,CQ对治疗非复杂性疟疾仍然有效,SP也是如此。然而,建议采用SP+CQ联合疗法以延缓SP耐药性的发展,并且需要定期监测新出现的CQ和SP耐药情况,以便规划替代抗疟药物方案。