LEAD-CNRS, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e70026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070026. Print 2013.
The extended time-based resource-sharing (TBRS) model suggested a working memory architecture in which an executive loop and a phonological loop could both support the maintenance of verbal information. The consequence of such a framework is that phonological effects known to impact the maintenance of verbal information, like the word length effect (WLE), should depend on the use of the phonological loop, but should disappear under the maintenance by the executive loop. In two previous studies, introducing concurrent articulation in complex span tasks barely affected WLE, contradicting the prediction from the TBRS model. The present study re-evaluated the WLE in a complex span task while controlling for time parameters and the amount of concurrent articulation. Specifically, we used a computer-paced span task in which participants remembered lists of either short or long words while concurrently either articulating or making a location judgment. Whereas the WLE appeared when participants remained silent, concurrent articulation eliminated the effect. Introducing a concurrent attention demand reduced recall, but did not affect WLE, and did not interact with concurrent articulation. These results support the existence of two systems of maintenance for verbal information.
基于时间的扩展资源共享 (TBRS) 模型提出了一种工作记忆架构,其中执行回路和语音回路都可以支持言语信息的维持。这样的框架的结果是,已知对言语信息维持有影响的语音效应,如词长效应 (WLE),应该取决于语音回路的使用,但应该在执行回路的维持下消失。在之前的两项研究中,在复杂跨度任务中引入并发发音几乎没有影响 WLE,这与 TBRS 模型的预测相矛盾。本研究在控制时间参数和并发发音数量的情况下,在复杂跨度任务中重新评估了 WLE。具体来说,我们使用计算机计时跨度任务,参与者在记住短词或长词列表的同时,要么进行发音,要么进行位置判断。当参与者保持沉默时,WLE 出现,而并发发音则消除了这种影响。引入并发注意力需求会降低回忆,但不会影响 WLE,也不会与并发发音相互作用。这些结果支持言语信息维持存在两个系统。