Walach Harald, Güthlin Corina, König Miriam
Department of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Hygiene, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetterstrasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Dec;9(6):837-46. doi: 10.1089/107555303771952181.
Although classic massage is used widely in Germany and elsewhere for treating chronic pain conditions, there are no randomized controlled trials (RCT).
Pragmatic RCT of classic massage compared to standard medical care (SMC) in chronic pain conditions of back, neck, shoulders, head and limbs.
Pain rating (nine-point Likert-scale; predefined main outcome criterion) at pretreatment, post-treatment, and 3 month follow-up, as well as pain adjective list, depression, anxiety, mood, and body concept.
Because of political and organizational problems, only 29 patients were randomized, 19 to receive massage, 10 to SMC. Pain improved significantly in both groups, but only in the massage group was it still significantly improved at follow-up. Depression and anxiety were improved significantly by both treatments, yet only in the massage group maintained at follow-up.
Despite its limitation resulting from problems with numbers and randomization this study shows that massage can be at least as effective as SMC in chronic pain syndromes. Relative changes are equal, but tend to last longer and to generalize more into psychologic domains. Because this is a pilot study, the results need replication, but our experiences might be useful for other researchers.
尽管经典按摩在德国及其他地方被广泛用于治疗慢性疼痛病症,但尚无随机对照试验(RCT)。
针对背部、颈部、肩部、头部和四肢慢性疼痛病症,将经典按摩与标准医疗护理(SMC)进行比较的实用RCT。
在治疗前、治疗后及3个月随访时的疼痛评分(九点李克特量表;预定义的主要结果标准),以及疼痛形容词列表、抑郁、焦虑、情绪和身体概念。
由于政治和组织问题,仅29例患者被随机分组,19例接受按摩,10例接受SMC。两组疼痛均显著改善,但仅按摩组在随访时仍显著改善。两种治疗均使抑郁和焦虑显著改善,但仅按摩组在随访时保持改善。
尽管本研究因数量和随机化问题存在局限性,但表明按摩在慢性疼痛综合征中至少与SMC一样有效。相对变化相同,但往往持续时间更长,且更能推广到心理领域。由于这是一项试点研究,结果需要重复验证,但我们的经验可能对其他研究人员有用。