Suppr超能文献

传统正骨手法治疗慢性颈痛的疗效:随机临床试验

Effectiveness of traditional bone setting in chronic neck pain: randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Zaproudina Nina, Hänninen Osmo O P, Airaksinen Olavi

机构信息

Project researcher, Department of Biomedicine, Physiology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jul-Aug;30(6):432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.05.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the effectiveness of traditional bone setting (TBS) in chronic neck pain (cNP) compared with conventional physiotherapy (PT) and massage (M).

METHODS

This was a randomized clinical trial. Working-aged employed subjects with cNP (n = 105; 37 men and 68 women; mean age, 41.5 years) were randomized into TBS, PT, and M groups. Follow-up times were 1, 6, and 12 months after the treatments. Neck pain intensity (visual analog scale), perceived disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI]), and neck spine mobility measurements were used as outcomes. Global assessment was evaluated by the subjects (scale from -1 to +10). Data were analyzed using time (pre and post) by group (TBS, PT and M), 2- way analysis of variance for repeated measures.

RESULTS

Neck pain decreased and NDI scores improved in all groups 1 month after the treatment (P < .001). The improvement of NDI and persons' satisfaction were significantly better after TBS. Neck spine mobility in rotation movements tended to improve significantly better and the frons-knee distance improved more after TBS. One year later, both NDI and neck pain were significantly better after TBS than in reference groups. A significant improvement was reported by 40% to 45.5% of subjects in the PT and M groups and by 68.6% in the TBS group. Bone setters' ability to communicate and to interact with patients was evaluated significantly higher. In the TBS group, the number of sick days was minimal as was the use of painkillers during 1-year follow-up compared to that in the reference groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional bone setting, which is a soft manual mobilization technique focusing on the muscles, joints, and ligaments, appears to be effective in cNP. Two thirds of subjects experienced it as beneficial, and it seems to be able to improve disability and pain in patients with cNP. Subjective and partially objective benefits of TBS were found in those patients more than after other interventions, and the effects lasted at least for 1 year.

摘要

目的

本研究评估传统正骨疗法(TBS)相较于传统物理治疗(PT)和按摩(M)对慢性颈部疼痛(cNP)的疗效。

方法

这是一项随机临床试验。将患有cNP的在职工作年龄受试者(n = 105;37名男性和68名女性;平均年龄41.5岁)随机分为TBS组、PT组和M组。治疗后的随访时间为1个月、6个月和12个月。采用颈部疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)、感知残疾程度(颈部残疾指数[NDI])以及颈椎活动度测量作为观察指标。由受试者进行整体评估(范围从 -1至 +10)。使用组(TBS、PT和M)×时间(治疗前和治疗后)的重复测量双向方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

治疗1个月后,所有组的颈部疼痛均减轻,NDI评分均有所改善(P < .001)。TBS治疗后,NDI的改善情况及患者满意度明显更佳。TBS治疗后,颈椎旋转活动度的改善更为显著,前额至膝盖的距离改善也更明显。1年后,TBS组的NDI和颈部疼痛情况均明显优于参照组。PT组和M组有40%至45.5%的受试者报告有显著改善,而TBS组这一比例为68.6%。对正骨师与患者沟通及互动能力的评价明显更高。与参照组相比,TBS组在1年随访期间的病假天数最少,止痛药使用量也最少。

结论

传统正骨疗法是一种专注于肌肉、关节和韧带的轻柔手法松动技术,似乎对慢性颈部疼痛有效。三分之二的受试者认为其有益,它似乎能够改善慢性颈部疼痛患者的残疾状况和疼痛。相较于其他干预措施,在这些患者中发现传统正骨疗法具有更多主观和部分客观益处,且效果至少持续1年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验