Meier Brian P, Robinson Michael D, Clore Gerald L
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):82-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502002.x.
Affect is a somewhat abstract concept that is frequently linked to physical metaphor. For example, good is often depicted as light (rather than dark), up (rather than down), and moving forward (rather than backward). The purpose of our studies was to examine whether the association between stimulus brightness and affect is optional or obligatory. In a series of three studies, participants categorized words as negative or positive. The valence of the words and the brightness of the letters were varied orthogonally. In Studies 1, 2, and 3, we found that categorization was inhibited when there was a mismatch between stimulus brightness (e.g., light) and word valence (e.g., negative). Studies 4 and 5 reveal boundary conditions for the effect. The studies suggest that, when making evaluations, people automatically assume that bright objects are good, whereas dark objects are bad.
情感是一个 somewhat 抽象的概念,常与身体隐喻相关联。例如,好常被描绘为光明(而非黑暗)、向上(而非向下)、向前移动(而非向后)。我们研究的目的是检验刺激亮度与情感之间的关联是随意的还是必然的。在一系列三项研究中,参与者将单词分类为消极或积极。单词的效价和字母的亮度进行了正交变化。在研究1、2和3中,我们发现当刺激亮度(如光明)与单词效价(如消极)不匹配时,分类受到抑制。研究4和5揭示了该效应的边界条件。这些研究表明,在进行评价时,人们会自动假定明亮的物体是好的,而黑暗的物体是坏的。