• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭护理和家务协助的个体决定因素。

Individual determinants of home-care nursing and housework assistance.

作者信息

Forbes Dorothy A, Stewart Norma, Morgan Debra, Anderson Malcolm, Parent Karen, Janzen Bonnie L

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Nurs Res. 2003 Dec;35(4):14-36.

PMID:14746119
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine individual determinants of use of publicly funded home-care nursing and housework assistance by Canadians 18 years and older from 1994 to 1999. Andersen and Newman's Behavioural Model of Health Services Use guided the selection of variables, analyses, and interpretation of the findings. Descriptive, correlation, and multiple logistic regression analyses were completed in each of the first 3 cross-sectional cycles of Statistics Canada's National Population Health Surveys. The determinants of use of housework assistance were older age, female, living alone, lower income, activity restriction, needing help with housework, not hospitalized in the previous year, and having at least 1 chronic condition. The determinants for home nursing tended to be the opposite of those for housework assistance. Between 1994 and 1999, use of housework assistance appeared to decrease and use of nursing services appeared to remain relatively stable. The findings underscore the need to target these 2 discrete subgroups of home-care users and ensure that funding is directed at support services as well as nursing services.

摘要

本研究旨在调查1994年至1999年期间18岁及以上加拿大民众使用公共资助的家庭护理和家务协助服务的个体决定因素。安德森和纽曼的卫生服务利用行为模型指导了变量的选择、分析以及研究结果的解释。在加拿大统计局全国人口健康调查的前3个横断面周期中,分别完成了描述性、相关性和多元逻辑回归分析。使用家务协助服务的决定因素包括年龄较大、女性、独居、收入较低、活动受限、需要家务帮助、前一年未住院以及患有至少一种慢性病。家庭护理的决定因素往往与家务协助的决定因素相反。1994年至1999年期间,家务协助服务的使用似乎有所减少,而护理服务的使用似乎保持相对稳定。研究结果强调了针对这两个不同的家庭护理用户亚组的必要性,并确保资金既用于支持服务,也用于护理服务。

相似文献

1
Individual determinants of home-care nursing and housework assistance.家庭护理和家务协助的个体决定因素。
Can J Nurs Res. 2003 Dec;35(4):14-36.
2
Older people's willingness to use home care nursing services.老年人使用居家护理服务的意愿。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Jul;51(2):166-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03482.x.
3
Gender differences in use and availability of home and community-based services for people with dementia.痴呆症患者居家和社区服务使用及可获得性方面的性别差异。
Can J Nurs Res. 2008 Mar;40(1):39-59.
4
Home- and community-based services utilization and aging in place.基于家庭和社区的服务利用与就地养老。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2010 Jul;29(3):138-54. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2010.511518.
5
Behavioral health needs and problem recognition by older adults receiving home-based aging services.老年人接受居家养老服务的行为健康需求和问题识别。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;24(4):400-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2135.
6
Functional ability and health complaints among older people with a combination of public and informal care vs. public care only.接受公共护理与非正式护理相结合的老年人与仅接受公共护理的老年人的功能能力和健康问题。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):136-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00549.x.
7
Factors influencing use of home care and nursing homes.影响家庭护理和养老院使用的因素。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 May;54(4):511-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03839.x.
8
[Objective and subjective determinants in the benefits of home help services for the elderly].[居家护理服务对老年人益处的客观与主观决定因素]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1996 Apr;44(2):163-72.
9
Living alone and outpatient care use by older veterans.老年退伍军人的独居情况及门诊医疗服务利用情况
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):617-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52172.x.
10
According to need? Predicting the amount of municipal home help allocated to elderly recipients in an urban area of Sweden.按需分配?预测瑞典某城市地区分配给老年受助者的市政居家护理服务量。
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Jul;13(4):366-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00570.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Socio-health factors, ability to perform instrumental and basic activities of daily living, and use of assistive mobility devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Interrelationships and impact on long-term survival.新冠疫情期间的社会健康因素、日常生活工具性和基本活动能力以及辅助移动设备的使用:相互关系及其对长期生存的影响
PLoS One. 2025 May 19;20(5):e0318481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318481. eCollection 2025.
2
Resource Utilization Groups in transitional home care: validating the RUG-III/HC case-mix system in hospital-to-home care programs.过渡性家庭护理中的资源利用分组:验证医院到家庭护理计划中的 RUG-III/HC 病例组合系统。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 30;23(1):1324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10150-1.
3
Measurement of special access to home visit nursing services among Japanese disabled elderly people: using GIS and claim data.
日本残疾老年人获得上门护理服务的特殊途径测量:利用地理信息系统和理赔数据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 30;17(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2322-0.
4
The impact of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in utilization of health services among rural residents in Guangxi, China.诱发因素、促成因素及需求因素对中国广西农村居民卫生服务利用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 19;16(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1825-4.
5
The Magnitude, Share and Determinants of Private Costs Incurred by Clients (and Their Caregivers) of In-home Publicly Financed Care.居家公共资助护理的客户(及其护理人员)产生的私人成本的规模、份额和决定因素。
Healthc Policy. 2007 Aug;3(1):e141-59.