Cervone David
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607-7137, USA. dcervone @ uic.edu
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):183-204. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.183.
This article presents a theoretical framework for analyzing psychological systems that contribute to the variability, consistency, and cross-situational coherence of personality functioning. In the proposed knowledge-and-appraisal personality architecture (KAPA), personality structures and processes are delineated by combining 2 principles: distinctions (a) between knowledge structures and appraisal processes and (b) among intentional cognitions with varying directions of fit, with the latter distinction differentiating among beliefs, evaluative standards, and aims. Basic principles of knowledge activation and use illuminate relations between knowledge and appraisal, yielding a synthetic account of personality structures and processes. Novel empirical data illustrate the heuristic value of the knowledge/appraisal distinction by showing how self-referent and situational knowledge combine to foster cross-situational coherence in appraisals of self-efficacy.
本文提出了一个理论框架,用于分析有助于人格功能的变异性、一致性和跨情境连贯性的心理系统。在所提出的知识与评估人格架构(KAPA)中,人格结构和过程是通过结合两条原则来界定的:一是(a)知识结构与评估过程之间的区分,二是(b)具有不同契合方向的意向性认知之间的区分,后一种区分在信念、评价标准和目标之间做出区分。知识激活和使用的基本原则阐明了知识与评估之间的关系,从而对人格结构和过程进行了综合阐述。新的实证数据通过展示自我参照知识和情境知识如何结合以促进自我效能感评估中的跨情境连贯性,说明了知识/评估区分的启发价值。