• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[2003年北京市严重急性呼吸综合征疫情期间检疫系统的效率]

[Efficiency of the quarantine system during the epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Beijing, 2003].

作者信息

Ou Jian-ming, Dun Zhe, Li Qin, Qin An-li, Zeng Guang

机构信息

Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Dec;24(12):1093-5.

PMID:14761622
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) hit Beijing, China, between March and July 2003 with an attack rate of 1.9 per 10 thousand. (2,521 cases). To control the epidemic of SARS, a total of 30,173 residents were quarantined either in their residence or in quarantine sites. In order to understand the personal need of being quarantined and to estimate the risk of developing SARS during the quarantine period, a survey on the quarantined residents of Haidian District, Beijing, China was carried out.

METHODS

33 precincts in Haidian District divided into five groups (7 in north, 6 in south, 7 in west, 6 in east and 7 in central of Haidian District) according to the location of the precincts were involved. The director of Center of Disease Control and Prevention of Haidian District was asked to select 1 precinct from each group according to the workload of the precinct quarantine officers. From those 5 precincts we obtained lists of all quarantined persons from the precinct quarantine officers. All quarantinees were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. The SARS patients were diagnosed and verified according to the diagnosis criteria released by Chinese Ministry of Health which was equivalent to the SARS 'probable case' definition of WHO. All SARS cases had been reported to the relative authorities.

RESULTS

By May 23, 2003, 5,186 persons had been quarantined in Haidian district, accounting for 0.23% of all residents. 1,028 of sampled quarantined residents completed the questionnaire. Of those who completed the questionnaire, 2.3% (95% CI: 1.5% - 3.5%) developed SARS while under quarantine. The median quarantine period was 14 days (range 1 day to 28 days). 61% of the quarantinees had a direct contact history with SARS patients, and all secondary SARS patients developed through contact to these quarantinees. The remaining 39% quarantinees who did not have a direct contact history with SARS patients had not developed SARS during the period under quarantine. 37% of the quarantees had direct contact during original patients' symptomatic period with an AR of 6.3%. Persons who looked after the illed SARS patient(s) during their symptomatic period, had an highest attack rate of 31% (95% CI: 20% - 44%). 63% (95% CI: 60% - 66%) of the total quarantined persons did not have direct contact with a SARS patient during his/her symptomatic period, with an attack rate of 0% (95% CI: 0% - 0.73%).

CONCLUSION

Only those persons having direct contact with ill SARS patients need to be under quarantine. The overall cost for quarantine on SARS prevention could be reduced by as much as 63% if the quarantine program was limited to this group. No evidence was found that SARS patient was infective during the incubation period.

摘要

目的

2003年3月至7月,严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)疫情袭击了中国北京,发病率为万分之一点九(共2521例)。为控制SARS疫情,共有30173名居民在其住所或隔离点被隔离。为了解被隔离人员的个人需求,并评估隔离期间感染SARS的风险,对中国北京市海淀区的被隔离居民进行了一项调查。

方法

海淀区的33个街道根据其地理位置分为五组(海淀区北部7个、南部6个、西部7个、东部6个、中部7个)。要求海淀区疾病预防控制中心主任根据街道隔离官员的工作量从每组中选择1个街道。从这5个街道的隔离官员那里获取所有被隔离人员的名单。所有被隔离人员都被要求填写一份自填式问卷。SARS患者根据中国卫生部发布的诊断标准进行诊断和核实,该标准等同于世界卫生组织的“SARS疑似病例”定义。所有SARS病例均已上报相关部门。

结果

截至2003年5月23日,海淀区共有5186人被隔离,占全区居民的0.23%。1028名被抽样的被隔离居民完成了问卷。在完成问卷的人员中,2.3%(95%可信区间:1.5% - 3.5%)在隔离期间感染了SARS。隔离期的中位数为14天(范围1天至28天)。61%的被隔离人员有与SARS患者的直接接触史,所有二代SARS患者均是通过与这些被隔离人员接触而感染的。其余39%没有与SARS患者直接接触史的被隔离人员在隔离期间未感染SARS。37%的被隔离人员在原发病例的症状期有直接接触,感染率为6.3%。在症状期照顾患病SARS患者的人员感染率最高,为31%(95%可信区间:20% - 44%)。63%(95%可信区间:60% - 66%)的被隔离人员在SARS患者症状期未与其直接接触,感染率为0%(95%可信区间:0% - 0.73%)。

结论

只有那些与患病SARS患者有直接接触的人员需要被隔离。如果隔离计划仅限于这一组人员,那么预防SARS的隔离总成本可降低多达63%。未发现有证据表明SARS患者在潜伏期具有传染性。

相似文献

1
[Efficiency of the quarantine system during the epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Beijing, 2003].[2003年北京市严重急性呼吸综合征疫情期间检疫系统的效率]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Dec;24(12):1093-5.
2
Efficiency of quarantine during an epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome--Beijing, China, 2003.2003年中国北京严重急性呼吸综合征疫情期间的隔离效果
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003 Oct 31;52(43):1037-40.
3
[Epidemiological characteristics of 403 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome in Haidian district, Beijing].[北京市海淀区403例严重急性呼吸综合征患者的流行病学特征]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jul;24(7):561-4.
4
[An outbreak of SARS in Dongcheng District, Beijing during March to June 2003].[2003年3月至6月间北京市东城区的严重急性呼吸综合征疫情]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2003 Oct;25(5):533-8.
5
[Study on the psychosocial status and related factors in three universities during severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Beijing].[北京市严重急性呼吸综合征流行期间三所大学学生心理社会状况及相关因素研究]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Jul;25(7):594-7.
6
[Epidemiological characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Tianjin and the assessment of effectiveness on measures of control].天津市严重急性呼吸综合征流行病学特征及防控措施效果评估
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jul;24(7):565-9.
7
[Epidemiological features of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Beijing].[北京严重急性呼吸综合征的流行病学特征]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Dec;24(12):1096-9.
8
[Analyses on one case of severe acute respiratory syndrome 'super transmitter' and chain of transmission].[1例严重急性呼吸综合征“超级传播者”及传播链分析]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jun;24(6):449-53.
9
[Study on the epidemiology and measures for control on severe acute respiratory syndrome in Guangzhou city].广州市严重急性呼吸综合征流行病学及防控措施研究
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 May;24(5):353-7.
10
Severe acute respiratory syndrome.严重急性呼吸综合征
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Dec;7(12):1117-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Field epidemiology training programs contribute to COVID-19 preparedness and response globally.现场流行病学培训项目为全球的 COVID-19 防控工作做出了贡献。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12422-z.
2
Cochrane Review: Interventions for the interruption or reduction of the spread of respiratory viruses.Cochrane系统评价:用于阻断或减少呼吸道病毒传播的干预措施
Evid Based Child Health. 2008 Dec;3(4):951-1013. doi: 10.1002/ebch.291. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
3
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.
中断或减少呼吸道病毒传播的物理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4.
4
Infectivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome during its incubation period.严重急性呼吸综合征潜伏期的传染性。
Biomed Environ Sci. 2009 Dec;22(6):502-10. doi: 10.1016/S0895-3988(10)60008-6.
5
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review.中断或减少呼吸道病毒传播的物理干预措施:系统评价
BMJ. 2009 Sep 21;339:b3675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3675.