Ximenes Ricardo, Southgate Brian, Smith Peter G, Guimarães Neto Leonardo
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Medicina Tropical, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2003 Dec;14(6):409-21. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892003001100006.
To identify and quantify the socioeconomic determinants of schistosomiasis in the urban section of São Lourenço da Mata, a town in the Northeast of Brazil.
A cross-sectional study was carried out in 1988 to measure the prevalence of schistosomiasis in São Lourenço da Mata among individuals aged 10-25 years and to estimate the socioeconomic characteristics of the households of those individuals. Household aggregation was tested. The data were analyzed on two levels, the family level and the individual level. On the family level we estimated the odds ratios for the association of schistosomiasis and socioeconomic variables related either to the head of the family or to the household. On the individual level we investigated if for the infected individuals there were differences in the intensity of infection (mean egg count) for the different levels of the socioeconomic variables.
We found a significant degree of household aggregation of schistosomiasis (allowing for sex and area of residence (neighborhoods with similar socioeconomic conditions, according to census data)). In the analysis on the family level, better socioeconomic indicators for the place in the productive process (occupation, economic sector, and position in production of the head of the family, plus family income) and better socioeconomic indicators for patterns of consumption (level of education of the head of the family, type of housing, household possessions, water supply for the home, sanitation (that is, excreta collection), and family access to medical care) were all associated with a lower risk of schistosomiasis. The estimation of the probability of schistosomiasis for different levels of the socioeconomic variables showed a lower risk (0.072) for individuals whose households were at the top (best) levels of the indicators relative to the risk (0.715) for individuals whose households were at the baseline (lowest) levels of the indicators. Infected individuals whose families had better socioeconomic conditions had lower mean egg count values.
Control measures that may have a long-term effect, such as improvements in the water supply and sanitation, should be strongly encouraged. The theoretical reduction that we found in the probability of being infected if water supply and sanitation were improved highlights the importance of these measures. Implementing them would have a more permanent effect on the control of schistosomiasis and would also result in other benefits to the population.
确定并量化巴西东北部城镇圣洛伦索达马塔市区血吸虫病的社会经济决定因素。
1988年开展了一项横断面研究,以测量圣洛伦索达马塔10至25岁人群中血吸虫病的患病率,并估计这些人群家庭的社会经济特征。对家庭聚集性进行了检验。数据在家庭层面和个体层面进行分析。在家庭层面,我们估计了血吸虫病与家庭户主或家庭相关的社会经济变量之间关联的比值比。在个体层面,我们调查了对于受感染个体,不同社会经济变量水平下感染强度(平均虫卵计数)是否存在差异。
我们发现血吸虫病存在显著程度的家庭聚集性(考虑性别和居住区域(根据人口普查数据,社会经济条件相似的街区))。在家庭层面的分析中,生产过程中地位的更好社会经济指标(职业、经济部门以及家庭户主在生产中的职位,加上家庭收入)以及消费模式的更好社会经济指标(家庭户主的教育水平、住房类型、家庭财产、家庭供水、卫生设施(即排泄物收集)以及家庭获得医疗服务的情况)均与较低的血吸虫病风险相关。对于不同社会经济变量水平下血吸虫病发生概率的估计显示,家庭处于指标最高(最佳)水平的个体风险较低(0.072),而家庭处于指标基线(最低)水平的个体风险为(0.715)。家庭社会经济条件较好的受感染个体平均虫卵计数值较低。
应大力鼓励采取可能具有长期效果的控制措施,如改善供水和卫生设施。我们发现改善供水和卫生设施后感染概率的理论降低凸显了这些措施的重要性。实施这些措施将对血吸虫病控制产生更持久的影响,同时也会给民众带来其他益处。