Grimes Jack E T, Croll David, Harrison Wendy E, Utzinger Jürg, Freeman Matthew C, Templeton Michael R
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Dec 4;8(12):e3296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003296. eCollection 2014 Dec.
Access to "safe" water and "adequate" sanitation are emphasized as important measures for schistosomiasis control. Indeed, the schistosomes' lifecycles suggest that their transmission may be reduced through safe water and adequate sanitation. However, the evidence has not previously been compiled in a systematic review.
We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting schistosome infection rates in people who do or do not have access to safe water and adequate sanitation. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 31 December 2013, without restrictions on year of publication or language. Studies' titles and abstracts were screened by two independent assessors. Papers deemed of interest were read in full and appropriate studies included in the meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed through the visual inspection of funnel plots and through Egger's test. Heterogeneity of datasets within the meta-analysis was quantified using Higgins' I2.
Safe water supplies were associated with significantly lower odds of schistosomiasis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.61). Adequate sanitation was associated with lower odds of Schistosoma mansoni, (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73) and Schistosoma haematobium (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.84). Included studies were mainly cross-sectional and quality was largely poor.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that increasing access to safe water and adequate sanitation are important measures to reduce the odds of schistosome infection. However, most of the studies were observational and quality was poor. Hence, there is a pressing need for adequately powered cluster randomized trials comparing schistosome infection risk with access to safe water and adequate sanitation, more studies which rigorously define water and sanitation, and new research on the relationships between water, sanitation, hygiene, human behavior, and schistosome transmission.
获取“安全”饮用水和“充足”卫生设施被强调为控制血吸虫病的重要措施。事实上,血吸虫的生命周期表明,通过安全饮用水和充足卫生设施可减少其传播。然而,此前相关证据尚未进行系统综述。
我们对报告了有或没有安全饮用水及充足卫生设施人群中血吸虫感染率的研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。检索了PubMed、科学网、Embase和考克兰图书馆,检索时间从建库至2013年12月31日,对发表年份和语言无限制。由两名独立评估人员筛选研究的标题和摘要。对认为有价值的论文进行全文阅读,并将合适的研究纳入荟萃分析。通过漏斗图的可视化检查和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。使用Higgins的I²对荟萃分析中数据集的异质性进行量化。
安全供水与血吸虫病感染几率显著降低相关(优势比(OR)=0.53,95%置信区间(CI):0.47 - 0.61)。充足卫生设施与曼氏血吸虫感染几率降低相关(OR = 0.59,95% CI:0.47 - 0.73),与埃及血吸虫感染几率降低相关(OR = 0.69,95% CI:0.57 - 0.84)。纳入的研究主要为横断面研究,质量大多较差。
结论/意义:我们的系统综述和荟萃分析表明,增加安全饮用水和充足卫生设施的可及性是降低血吸虫感染几率的重要措施。然而,大多数研究为观察性研究且质量较差。因此,迫切需要开展有足够效力的整群随机试验,比较血吸虫感染风险与安全饮用水及充足卫生设施的可及性,开展更多严格定义水和卫生设施的研究,以及关于水、卫生设施、卫生习惯、人类行为和血吸虫传播之间关系的新研究。