Suppr超能文献

发热的原因及C反应蛋白和降钙素原在鉴别感染性发热与副肿瘤性发热中的价值

Causes of fever and value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in differentiating infections from paraneoplastic fever.

作者信息

Penel Nicolas, Fournier Charles, Clisant Stéphanie, N'Guyen Michèle

机构信息

Département de cancérologie générale, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue F Combemale, 59020 Lille, France.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2004 Aug;12(8):593-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0602-9. Epub 2004 Feb 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of our retrospective study were to study first the causes of 245 febrile episodes in cancer patients and then the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating infections from paraneoplastic fever.

METHOD

The causes of fever were studied in 245 consecutive cases observed between January and December 2002, and PCT and CRP diagnostic value in 155 cases (114 infections and 41 paraneoplastic fever).

RESULTS

The two main causes of fever were infection (121 cases) and paraneoplastic fever (43 cases); 77 infections were microbiologically documented. Cocci gram positive caused 41 out of 77 documented infections. Paraneoplastic fever was more frequent in metastatic disease ( p=6.10(-6)). CRP and PCT serum levels at admission did not differ significantly in the infection group and paraneoplastic fever group (respectively p=0.39 and p=0.14 with Mann-Whitney test). The PCT and CRP levels had poor prognostic value in infection (respectively 0.04 and 0.0003 with Mann-Whitney test).

CONCLUSION

Causes of fever are very numerous in cancer patients (more than 75 different causes in this study). Bacterial infection is the most frequent cause. PCT and CRP failed to discriminate infection, but both had pejorative prognostic value in infected patients.

摘要

目的

我们这项回顾性研究的目的首先是研究癌症患者245次发热发作的原因,其次是研究降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)在区分感染与副肿瘤性发热方面的价值。

方法

对2002年1月至12月间观察的245例连续病例的发热原因进行研究,并对155例病例(114例感染和41例副肿瘤性发热)的PCT和CRP诊断价值进行研究。

结果

发热的两个主要原因是感染(121例)和副肿瘤性发热(43例);77例感染有微生物学记录。77例有记录的感染中,革兰氏阳性球菌导致了41例。副肿瘤性发热在转移性疾病中更常见(p = 6.10(-6))。感染组和副肿瘤性发热组入院时的CRP和PCT血清水平无显著差异(曼-惠特尼检验分别为p = 0.39和p = 0.14)。PCT和CRP水平在感染中的预后价值较差(曼-惠特尼检验分别为0.04和0.0003)。

结论

癌症患者发热的原因非常多(本研究中有超过75种不同原因)。细菌感染是最常见的原因。PCT和CRP无法区分感染,但两者在感染患者中都有不良预后价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验