Katch V L, Moorehead C P, Becque M D, Rocchini A P
Behnke Laboratory for Body Composition Research, Department of Movement Science, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(6):535-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00602361.
Post-meal energy expenditure (TEM) was compared for 14 healthy obese (body fat = 45.3%, body mass index, BMI = 35.9 kg m-2) and 9 healthy nonobese (body fat = 20.7%, BMI = 17.8 kg m-2) adolescent girls. The test meal for both groups was a standard 3348.8-kJ, 0.473-1 chocolate milkshake of 15% protein (casein), 40% fat (polyunsaturated/saturated ratio = 0.05; 75 mg cholesterol) and 45% carbohydrate (lactose and sucrose). Glucose, insulin and resting energy expenditure (RMR) were measured at rest prior to meal consumption and 20, 40, 60, 90, and 120 min after the meal. Cumulative net TEM was calculated as the integrated area under the TEM curve with RMR as baseline. Reliability was assessed by retesting 4 subjects, and a placebo effect was tested by administering a flavored energy-free drink. Results indicated high reliability and no placebo effect. The meal resulted in a greater rise in insulin and glucose for the obese compared to the nonobese subjects (P < or = 0.05), and a significant TEM for both groups (P < or = 0.05). The cumulative TEM (W kg-1) was 61.9% greater for the nonobese (P < 0.01) when expressed relative to body mass, and 33.2% greater for the nonobese (P < or = 0.01) when expressed relative to the fat-free body mass. Expressed relative to the meal, the TEM was 25.5% less for the obese (P < 0.01). The data support an energy conservation hypothesis for obese female adolescents.
对14名健康肥胖(体脂率 = 45.3%,体重指数,BMI = 35.9 kg/m²)和9名健康非肥胖(体脂率 = 20.7%,BMI = 17.8 kg/m²)的青春期女孩的餐后能量消耗(TEM)进行了比较。两组的测试餐均为标准的3348.8千焦、0.473升含15%蛋白质(酪蛋白)、40%脂肪(多不饱和/饱和比例 = 0.05;75毫克胆固醇)和45%碳水化合物(乳糖和蔗糖)的巧克力奶昔。在进餐前休息时以及进餐后20、40、60、90和120分钟测量血糖、胰岛素和静息能量消耗(RMR)。以RMR为基线,将累积净TEM计算为TEM曲线下的积分面积。通过对4名受试者进行重新测试来评估可靠性,并通过给予一种调味无能量饮料来测试安慰剂效应。结果表明可靠性高且无安慰剂效应。与非肥胖受试者相比,该餐导致肥胖受试者的胰岛素和血糖升高幅度更大(P≤0.05),并且两组的TEM均显著升高(P≤0.05)。相对于体重而言,非肥胖者的累积TEM(W/kg)高出61.9%(P<0.01),相对于去脂体重而言,非肥胖者高出33.2%(P≤0.01)。相对于餐食而言,肥胖者的TEM低25.5%(P<0.01)。这些数据支持了肥胖女性青少年的能量节约假说。