Van Bourgondien M E, Marcus L M, Schopler E
Division TEACCH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1992 Dec;22(4):493-506. doi: 10.1007/BF01046324.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the issue of whether DSM-III-R (American Psychological Association [APA], 1987) over- or underdiagnoses autism by comparing this diagnostic system to a well-established objective measure of diagnosis, the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). A secondary goal was to determine which of the 16 criteria are the best discriminators of autism. DSM-III-R, CARS, and clinical diagnoses of 138 consecutive admissions to a statewide program for the diagnosis and treatment of autistic and related communication-handicapped individuals (Division TEACCH in North Carolina) were compared. Results indicated a generally high degree of agreement on the diagnosis of autism using the three systems. Within this treatment-oriented program, the CARS and clinical ratings diagnosed a greater number of cases as autistic than did the DSM-III-R criteria, suggesting that DSM-III-R slightly underdiagnosed autism. The criteria that most strongly related to the diagnosis of autism regardless of the system were lack of awareness of others, abnormal social play, an impaired ability to make friends, abnormal nonverbal communication, stereotypic body movements, and restricted range of interests.
本研究的目的是通过将DSM-III-R(美国心理协会[APA],1987年)这一诊断系统与成熟的客观诊断指标——儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)进行比较,来阐明DSM-III-R对自闭症的诊断是过度还是不足的问题。第二个目标是确定16项标准中哪些是自闭症的最佳鉴别指标。对北卡罗来纳州全州范围内针对自闭症及相关沟通障碍个体的诊断与治疗项目(TEACCH部门)连续收治的138例患者的DSM-III-R、CARS及临床诊断结果进行了比较。结果表明,使用这三种系统对自闭症的诊断总体上具有高度一致性。在这个以治疗为导向的项目中,CARS和临床评定诊断为自闭症的病例数比DSM-III-R标准诊断出的更多,这表明DSM-III-R对自闭症的诊断略有不足。无论采用哪种系统,与自闭症诊断最密切相关的标准是对他人缺乏意识、异常的社交游戏、交友能力受损、异常的非言语沟通、刻板的身体动作以及兴趣范围狭窄。