Eaves R C, Milner B
Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;21(5):481-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00916315.
The present study sought to examine the relationship between two popular instruments for screening autistic children: the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC). The sample included 77 individuals. The records of 48 subjects contained firm diagnoses of autism, while the suggestion of autism was found in the remaining records. Correlations between the two scales ranged from -.16 to .73 (median = .39). The validity coefficient between the two total scores was .67. Using cutoff scores recommended by the authors, an analysis of the sensitivity of the two instruments was conducted. The CARS correctly identified 98% of the autistic subjects; it identified 69% of the possibly autistic as autistic. The ABC correctly identified 88% of the autistic subjects, while it identified 48% of those subjects considered possibly autistic as autistic. A phi coefficient was computed to estimate the degree of relationship between the nominal classifications produced by the two instruments. A moderate relationship was found (r phi = .54). Implications of the results are discussed.
儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)和自闭症行为检查表(ABC)。样本包括77名个体。48名受试者的记录中有明确的自闭症诊断,而其余记录中则发现有自闭症的迹象。两种量表之间的相关性在-0.16至0.73之间(中位数=0.39)。两个总分之间的效度系数为0.67。使用作者推荐的临界分数,对这两种工具的敏感性进行了分析。CARS正确识别了98%的自闭症受试者;它将69%可能患有自闭症的人识别为自闭症患者。ABC正确识别了88%的自闭症受试者,而它将48%被认为可能患有自闭症的受试者识别为自闭症患者。计算了phi系数以估计两种工具产生的名义分类之间的关系程度。发现存在中等程度的关系(r phi = 0.54)。讨论了结果的意义。