• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Salmeterol versus slow-release theophylline combined with ketotifen in nocturnal asthma: a multicentre trial. French Multicentre Study Group.

作者信息

Muir J F, Bertin L, Georges D

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie, Höpital de Bois Guillaume, France.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1992 Nov;5(10):1197-200.

PMID:1486965
Abstract

We wished to assess the efficacy of inhaled salmeterol (SML; 50 micrograms b.i.d.) compared to a combination of slow-release theophylline and ketotifen p.o. (TK; T 300 mg+K 1 mg b.i.d.) for the treatment of nocturnal asthma. Ninety six patients with nocturnal asthma, (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 60-90% of predicted value, reversibility > or = 15%, at least two nocturnal awakenings per week) were eligible for a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy cross-over study (14-day run-in, two successive 28-day treatment periods). Efficacy was assessed as success/failure, success being defined as the complete disappearance of nocturnal symptoms/awakening during the last week of each treatment period. There was a statistically significant difference between SML and TK for this criterion: 46% and 39% success with SML during periods I (first 28-day period) and II (following the cross-over), compared to only 15% and 26% with TK, respectively (p < 0.01). SML was also significantly better for the other criteria (lung function, rescue salbutamol intake during day and night). Side-effects were five times less frequent in SML-treated patients (p < 0.004). Efficacy and tolerance of SML were obviously far better than those of TK in patients with nocturnal asthma.

摘要

相似文献

1
Salmeterol versus slow-release theophylline combined with ketotifen in nocturnal asthma: a multicentre trial. French Multicentre Study Group.
Eur Respir J. 1992 Nov;5(10):1197-200.
2
[Usefulness of salmeterol in nocturnal asthma: a comparative study with theophylline-ketotifen association. A French multicenter group].沙美特罗在夜间哮喘中的应用:与茶碱-酮替芬联合用药的对比研究。一个法国多中心研究小组
Rev Mal Respir. 1992;9 Suppl 1:R23-6.
3
Comparison of a short course of prednisolone with sustained-release theophylline in the control of nocturnal asthma.泼尼松龙短疗程与缓释茶碱在控制夜间哮喘方面的比较。
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1995 Jan-Mar;37(1):7-14.
4
[Therapy of nocturnal asthma: salmeterol versus nocturnal administration of retard theophylline--comparison of effectiveness and tolerance].
Pneumologie. 1997 Mar;51(3):317-23.
5
Comparative study of extended release albuterol sulfate and long-acting inhaled salmeterol xinafoate in the treatment of nocturnal asthma.硫酸沙丁胺醇缓释剂与长效吸入性昔萘酸沙美特罗治疗夜间哮喘的对比研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Aug;83(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62622-1.
6
Salmeterol vs theophylline: sleep and efficacy outcomes in patients with nocturnal asthma.沙美特罗与茶碱对比:夜间哮喘患者的睡眠及疗效结果
Chest. 1999 Jun;115(6):1525-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.6.1525.
7
A twelve month comparison of salmeterol with salbutamol in asthmatic patients. European Study Group.沙美特罗与沙丁胺醇对哮喘患者的十二个月比较。欧洲研究小组。
Eur Respir J. 1992 Oct;5(9):1062-7.
8
Inhaled salmeterol or oral theophylline in nocturnal asthma?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Jan;155(1):104-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001297.
9
[Slow-release salbutamol in the treatment of nocturnal asthma. Result of a comparative study vs. long-acting theophylline].[缓释沙丁胺醇治疗夜间哮喘。与长效茶碱对比研究的结果]
Rev Pneumol Clin. 1991;47(3):120-4.
10
Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and individually dose-titrated slow-release theophylline in patients with reversible airway obstruction. European Study Group.吸入性沙美特罗与个体化剂量滴定缓释茶碱治疗可逆性气道阻塞患者的比较。欧洲研究小组。
Eur Respir J. 1996 Aug;9(8):1689-95. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09081689.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential adverse effects of bronchodilators in the treatment of airways obstruction in older people: recommendations for prescribing.支气管扩张剂治疗老年人气道阻塞的潜在不良反应:处方建议
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(5):415-43. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825050-00005.
2
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus theophylline for maintenance treatment of asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与茶碱用于哮喘维持治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD001281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001281.pub2.
3
Oral xanthines as maintenance treatment for asthma in children.
口服黄嘌呤类药物作为儿童哮喘的维持治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD002885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002885.pub2.
4
Nocturnal asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids: theophylline or long-acting beta2 agonists?吸入性糖皮质激素无法控制的夜间哮喘:茶碱还是长效β2受体激动剂?
Drugs. 2001;61(3):391-418. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161030-00007.
5
Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.《1999年加拿大哮喘共识报告》。加拿大哮喘共识小组。
CMAJ. 1999 Nov 30;161(11 Suppl):S1-61.
6
Long acting beta(2) agonists and theophylline in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效β₂受体激动剂与茶碱用于稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Thorax. 1999 Aug;54(8):730-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.8.730.
7
Salmeterol. An appraisal of its quality-of-life benefits and potential pharmacoeconomic positioning in asthma.沙美特罗。对其在哮喘中改善生活质量的益处及潜在药物经济学定位的评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jun;7(6):562-74. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00010.
8
Salmeterol. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of children with asthma.沙美特罗。关于其药理特性及在儿童哮喘管理中的临床疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1997 Aug;54(2):331-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754020-00011.
9
Salmeterol: an inhaled beta 2-agonist with prolonged duration of action.沙美特罗:一种吸入性长效β2受体激动剂。
Lung. 1993;171(5):249-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03215869.
10
Long- versus short-acting beta 2-agonists. Implications for drug therapy.长效与短效β2受体激动剂。对药物治疗的影响。
Drugs. 1994 Feb;47(2):207-22. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199447020-00001.