Suppr超能文献

儿童焦虑测量工具真的能测量焦虑吗?

Do childhood anxiety measures measure anxiety?

作者信息

Perrin S, Last C G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Nova University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1992 Dec;20(6):567-78. doi: 10.1007/BF00911241.

Abstract

The Fear Survey Schedule for Children-Revised (FSSC-R), Revised-Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS), and the Modified State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC-M) are three widely used self-report measures of childhood anxiety. While previous studies have established the reliability of these measures, their validity in discriminating anxious from non-anxious youngsters remains to be established. The present study examines the discriminant validity of the three measures by comparing clinic referred samples of boys with an anxiety disorder (n = 105) or ADHD (n = 59) with a community sample of never-psychiatrically-ill boys (n = 49). Results indicated that the two patient groups differed significantly from the never-psychiatrically-ill group on the RCMAS and STAIC-M, but the anxious and ADHD groups did not differ from each other. None of the three groups differed on the FSSC-R. The implications of these findings for the assessment of childhood anxiety disorders are discussed.

摘要

儿童恐惧调查表修订版(FSSC-R)、修订版儿童显性焦虑量表(RCMAS)以及修订版儿童状态-特质焦虑量表(STAIC-M)是三种广泛使用的儿童焦虑自陈量表。虽然先前的研究已经确立了这些量表的信度,但其在区分焦虑儿童与非焦虑儿童方面的效度仍有待确立。本研究通过比较临床转介的患有焦虑症的男孩样本(n = 105)或多动症的男孩样本(n = 59)与从未患过精神疾病的社区男孩样本(n = 49),来检验这三种量表的区分效度。结果表明,在RCMAS和STAIC-M上,两个患者组与从未患过精神疾病的组有显著差异,但焦虑组和多动症组之间没有差异。三组在FSSC-R上没有差异。本文讨论了这些发现对儿童焦虑症评估的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验