Suppr超能文献

扩大金标准对一种化学发光免疫分析法性能的影响,该方法用于检测男性离心后的首次晨尿和尿道拭子样本中的沙眼衣原体抗原。

Effects of broadening the gold standard on the performance of a chemiluminometric immunoassay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in centrifuged first void urine and urethral swab samples from men.

作者信息

Jang D, Sellors J W, Mahony J B, Pickard L, Chernesky M A

机构信息

McMaster University Regional Virology and Chlamydiology Laboratory, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Nov-Dec;19(6):315-9.

PMID:1492256
Abstract

Traditionally, evaluations of nonculture assays for Chlamydia trachomatis are based on a comparison with urethral culture in men and cervical culture in women as the standard for positivity of infection, but it is known that culture may be less than 100% sensitive. A chemiluminometric immunoassay, Magic Lite (Ciba Corning, Medfield, MA) that detects C. trachomatis antigens was performed on centrifuged first void urine samples and urethral swabs collected from men attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic. Immunoassay performance was compared to urethral culture and also to a broader gold standard: an infected patient with positive culture results or a confirmed positive Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay (Abbott, Chicago) result. Two studies were performed on a retrospective group of stored first void urine samples from 200 men and a prospective group of urethral swabs and first void urine samples from 199 men. Expanding the gold standard showed that a urethral swab assayed by culture had a sensitivity between 70.3% and 87.5%, with the following effects on immunoassay performance in the prospective study: the sensitivity of urethral swabbing was reduced from 96.2% to 78.4% (specificity increased from 96.0% to 98.1%) and first void urine sensitivity increased from 92.3% to 94.6% (specificity went from 87.9% to 93.8%). In the retrospective study, sensitivity of first void urine testing went from 91.4% to 92.5%, with a corresponding increase in specificity from 93.9% to 96.9%. This maneuver had relatively little impact on the negative predictive values, but dramatically increased the positive predictive values, for both samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

传统上,沙眼衣原体非培养检测方法的评估是基于与男性尿道培养及女性宫颈培养结果进行比较,将其作为感染阳性的标准,但众所周知,培养法的敏感性可能不到100%。对从一家性传播疾病(STD)诊所就诊的男性中采集的离心首次晨尿样本和尿道拭子进行了检测沙眼衣原体抗原的化学发光免疫分析,即Magic Lite(Ciba Corning公司,马萨诸塞州梅德菲尔德)。将免疫分析性能与尿道培养结果进行比较,同时也与一个更广泛的金标准进行比较:培养结果阳性的感染患者或经确认的衣原体酶免疫分析(雅培公司,芝加哥)结果阳性的患者。对200名男性的一组回顾性储存首次晨尿样本以及199名男性的一组前瞻性尿道拭子和首次晨尿样本进行了两项研究。扩大金标准显示,经培养检测的尿道拭子敏感性在70.3%至87.5%之间,在前瞻性研究中对免疫分析性能有以下影响:尿道拭子检测的敏感性从96.2%降至78.4%(特异性从96.0%增至98.1%),首次晨尿检测的敏感性从92.3%增至94.6%(特异性从87.9%增至93.8%)。在回顾性研究中,首次晨尿检测的敏感性从91.4%增至92.5%,特异性相应地从93.9%增至96.9%。这一操作对两个样本的阴性预测值影响相对较小,但显著提高了阳性预测值。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验