Kane Christopher J, Mitchell Joseph A, Meng Maxwell V, Anast Jason, Carroll Peter R, Stoller Marshall L
Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-1695, USA.
Urology. 2004 Feb;63(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.041.
To report our laparoscopic partial nephrectomy experience and the impact of temporary arterial occlusion during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy on postoperative renal function. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is increasingly popular but remains technically challenging.
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed in 27 patients, with arterial occlusion in 15 cases. Postoperative renal function was evaluated with serum creatinine in all patients and postoperative technetium-99m mercaptoacetyl triglycine renal scans in a subset of patients after arterial occlusion.
The group with arterial occlusion (n = 15) did not differ from those without arterial occlusion (n = 12) with respect to age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, lesion size, operative time, blood loss, or complications. In patients undergoing arterial occlusion, the mean warm ischemia time was 43 +/- 10 minutes (range 25 to 65). The preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels were unchanged in patients with (1.07 +/- 0.4 to 1.15 +/- 0.4 ng/dL; P = 0.24) and without (0.96 +/- 0.22 to 1.07 +/- 0.27 ng/dL; P = 0.14) arterial occlusion. The tumor size on imaging correlated with postoperative serum creatinine (r2 = 0.450, P = 0.04). Nuclear renography was performed in 9 patients (60%) after renal artery occlusion. The mean differential renal function of the operated kidney (49%) was similar to that of the contralateral kidney (51%) and was not associated with warm ischemic time or tumor size.
Temporary arterial occlusion during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy does not appear to affect short-term renal function adversely. We believe that this technique can be safely performed when significant bleeding or entry into the collecting system is anticipated. Additional study is warranted to identify the maximal time of warm ischemia and ways to reduce potential renal injury.
报告我们的腹腔镜部分肾切除术经验以及腹腔镜部分肾切除术期间临时动脉阻断对术后肾功能的影响。腹腔镜部分肾切除术越来越受欢迎,但在技术上仍然具有挑战性。
对27例患者实施了腹腔镜部分肾切除术,其中15例进行了动脉阻断。所有患者均通过血清肌酐评估术后肾功能,对动脉阻断后的部分患者进行术后锝-99m巯基乙酰三甘氨酸肾扫描。
动脉阻断组(n = 15)与未进行动脉阻断组(n = 12)在年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分、病变大小、手术时间、失血量或并发症方面无差异。在进行动脉阻断的患者中,平均热缺血时间为43±10分钟(范围25至65分钟)。有(1.07±0.4至1.15±0.4 ng/dL;P = 0.24)和无(0.96±0.22至1.07±0.27 ng/dL;P = 0.14)动脉阻断的患者术前和术后血清肌酐水平均未改变。影像学上的肿瘤大小与术后血清肌酐相关(r2 = 0.450,P = 0.04)。9例(60%)患者在肾动脉阻断后进行了核素肾显像。手术侧肾脏的平均分肾功能(49%)与对侧肾脏(51%)相似,且与热缺血时间或肿瘤大小无关。
腹腔镜部分肾切除术期间的临时动脉阻断似乎不会对短期肾功能产生不利影响。我们认为,当预计会出现大量出血或进入集合系统时,可以安全地实施该技术。有必要进行进一步研究以确定热缺血的最长时间以及减少潜在肾损伤的方法。