Chu C M, Cheng V C C, Hung I F N, Wong M M L, Chan K H, Chan K S, Kao R Y T, Poon L L M, Wong C L P, Guan Y, Peiris J S M, Yuen K Y
Department of Microbiology and Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Thorax. 2004 Mar;59(3):252-6. doi: 10.1136/thorax.2003.012658.
The clinical response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin was examined after establishing the in vitro antiviral susceptibility of the SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of antiviral agents.
The in vitro susceptibility of the prototype of SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors currently licensed for clinical use was studied. Forty one patients with SARS followed for 3 weeks were treated with a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin. The clinical progress and virological outcomes were monitored and compared with 111 patients treated with ribavirin only who served as historical controls.
In vitro antiviral activity against SARS associated coronavirus was demonstrated for lopinavir and ribavirin at concentrations of 4 micro g/ml and 50 micro g/ml, respectively, only at 48 hours. The adverse clinical outcome (ARDS or death) was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the historical controls (2.4% v 28.8%, p<0.001) at day 21 after the onset of symptoms. The adverse outcome remained significantly lower in the treatment group than in the controls-both those diagnosed early (p<0.001) and those diagnosed later in the course of the epidemic (p = 0.002)-but there was no significant difference in adverse outcome rates between the two time periods (p = 0.548). No time related difference in outcome was observed in the control groups. A reduction in steroid usage and nosocomial infections was seen in patients initially treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, and these patients had a decreasing viral load and rising peripheral lymphocyte count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, hepatitis B carrier status, and lack of treatment with this antiviral combination were independent predictors of an adverse outcome. Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment was associated with a better outcome even when adjusted for baseline lactate dehydrogenase level.
The apparent favourable clinical response with lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin supports further randomised placebo controlled trials in patients with SARS.
在确定严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)相关冠状病毒对一组抗病毒药物的体外抗病毒敏感性之后,对SARS患者使用洛匹那韦/利托那韦和利巴韦林联合治疗的临床反应进行了研究。
研究了SARS相关冠状病毒原型对一组目前已获临床许可的核苷类似物和蛋白酶抑制剂的体外敏感性。41例随访3周的SARS患者接受了洛匹那韦/利托那韦和利巴韦林联合治疗。对临床进展和病毒学结果进行了监测,并与111例仅接受利巴韦林治疗的患者(作为历史对照)进行了比较。
仅在48小时时,洛匹那韦和利巴韦林分别在浓度为4μg/ml和50μg/ml时显示出对SARS相关冠状病毒的体外抗病毒活性。症状出现后第21天,治疗组的不良临床结局(急性呼吸窘迫综合征或死亡)显著低于历史对照组(2.4%对28.8%,p<0.001)。治疗组的不良结局仍显著低于对照组——包括早期诊断的患者(p<0.001)和在疫情后期诊断的患者(p = 0.002)——但两个时间段的不良结局发生率无显著差异(p = 0.548)。对照组未观察到与时间相关的结局差异。最初接受洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的患者类固醇使用量和医院感染减少,这些患者的病毒载量降低,外周淋巴细胞计数升高。多因素分析显示,年龄、乙肝携带者状态以及未使用这种抗病毒联合治疗是不良结局的独立预测因素。即使对基线乳酸脱氢酶水平进行校正,洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的结局仍较好。
洛匹那韦/利托那韦和利巴韦林明显良好的临床反应支持在SARS患者中进一步开展随机安慰剂对照试验。