Alvarez Guy E, Ballard Tasha P, Beske Stacy D, Davy Kevin P
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Jul;287(1):H414-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01046.2003. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
We tested the hypothesis that muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) would not differ in subcutaneously obese (SUBOB) and nonobese (NO) men with similar levels of abdominal visceral fat despite higher plasma leptin concentrations in the former. We further hypothesized that abdominal visceral fat would be the strongest body composition- or regional fat distribution-related correlate of MSNA among these individuals. To accomplish this, we measured MSNA (via microneurography), body composition (via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and abdominal fat distribution (via computed tomography) in 15 NO (body mass index </= 25 kg/m(2); 22.4 +/- 1.4 yr) and 9 SUBOB (25 </= body mass index </= 35 kg/m(2); 23.4 +/- 2.1 yr) sedentary men. As expected, body mass (94 +/- 4 vs. 71 +/- 2 kg), total fat mass (25 +/- 2 vs. 12 +/- 1 kg), and abdominal subcutaneous fat (307 +/- 36 vs. 132 +/- 12 cm(2)) were significantly higher in the SUBOB group compared with NO peers. However, the level of abdominal visceral fat did not differ significantly in the two groups (69 +/- 7 vs. 55 +/- 5 cm(2)). MSNA was not different between SUBOB and NO men (23 +/- 3 vs. 24 +/- 2 bursts/min; P > 0.05, respectively) despite approximately 2.6-fold higher (P < 0.05) plasma leptin concentration in the SUBOB men. Furthermore, abdominal visceral fat was the only body composition- or regional fat distribution-related correlate (r = 0.45; P < 0.05) of MSNA in the pooled sample. In addition, abdominal visceral fat was related to MSNA in NO (r = 0.58; P = 0.0239) but not SUBOB (r = 0.39; P = 0.3027) men. Taken together with our previous observations, our findings suggest that the relation between obesity and MSNA is phenotype dependent. The relation between abdominal visceral fat and MSNA was evident in NO but not in SUBOB men and at levels of abdominal visceral fat below the level typically associated with elevated cardiovascular and metabolic disease risk. Our observations do not support an obvious role for leptin in contributing to sympathetic neural activation in human obesity and, in turn, are inconsistent with the concept of selective leptin resistance.
对于腹部内脏脂肪水平相似的皮下肥胖(SUBOB)男性和非肥胖(NO)男性,尽管前者的血浆瘦素浓度较高,但肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)并无差异。我们进一步假设,在这些个体中,腹部内脏脂肪将是与MSNA相关的最强的身体成分或局部脂肪分布因素。为实现这一目标,我们对15名久坐不动的非肥胖男性(体重指数≤25kg/m²;22.4±1.4岁)和9名皮下肥胖男性(25≤体重指数≤35kg/m²;23.4±2.1岁)测量了MSNA(通过微神经ography)、身体成分(通过双能X线吸收法)和腹部脂肪分布(通过计算机断层扫描)。正如预期的那样,皮下肥胖组的体重(94±4 vs. 71±2kg)、总脂肪量(25±2 vs. 12±1kg)和腹部皮下脂肪(307±36 vs. 132±12cm²)显著高于非肥胖组同龄人。然而,两组的腹部内脏脂肪水平并无显著差异(69±7 vs. 55±5cm²)。皮下肥胖男性和非肥胖男性之间的MSNA并无差异(23±3 vs. 24±2次/分钟;P>0.05),尽管皮下肥胖男性的血浆瘦素浓度高出约2.6倍(P<0.05)。此外,腹部内脏脂肪是合并样本中与MSNA相关的唯一身体成分或局部脂肪分布因素(r = 0.45;P<0.05)。此外,腹部内脏脂肪与非肥胖男性的MSNA相关(r = 0.58;P = 0.0239),但与皮下肥胖男性无关(r = 0.39;P = 0.3027)。结合我们之前的观察结果,我们的发现表明肥胖与MSNA之间的关系取决于表型。腹部内脏脂肪与MSNA之间的关系在非肥胖男性中明显,但在皮下肥胖男性中不明显,且腹部内脏脂肪水平低于通常与心血管和代谢疾病风险升高相关的水平。我们的观察结果不支持瘦素在人类肥胖中导致交感神经激活方面起明显作用,进而与选择性瘦素抵抗的概念不一致。