Suppr超能文献

基于偏好的围产期护理效益测量方法。

Preference-based approaches to measuring the benefits of perinatal care.

作者信息

Petrou Stavros, Henderson Jane

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, England.

出版信息

Birth. 2003 Dec;30(4):217-26. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.0251a.x.

Abstract

Studies that measure benefits of health care interventions in natural or physical units cannot incorporate the several health changes that might occur within a single measure, and they overlook individuals' preferences for those health changes. This paper discusses and critically appraises the application of preference-based approaches to the measurement of the benefits of perinatal care that have developed out of economic theory. These include quality adjusted life year (QALY)-based approaches, monetary-based approaches, and discrete choice experiments. QALY-based approaches use scaling techniques, such as the rating scale, standard gamble approach, and time trade-off approach, or multi-attribute utility measures, to measure the health-related quality of life weights of health states. Monetary-based approaches include the revealed preference approach, which involves observing decisions that individuals actually make concerning health risks, and the willingness-to-pay approach, which provides a framework for investigating individuals' willingness to pay for benefits of health care interventions. Discrete choice experiments describe health care interventions in terms of their attributes, and elicit preferences for scenarios that combine different levels of those attributes. Empirical examples are used to illustrate each preference-based approach to benefit measurement, and several methodological issues raised by the application of these approaches to the perinatal context are discussed. Particular attention is given to identifying the relevant attributes to incorporate into the measurement instrument, appropriate respondents for the measurement exercise, potential sources of bias in description and valuation processes, and the practicality, reliability, and validity of alternative measurement approaches. The paper's conclusion is that researchers should be explicit and rigorous in their application of preference-based approaches to benefit measurement in the context of perinatal care.

摘要

以自然或物理单位衡量医疗保健干预效益的研究,无法纳入可能在单一衡量指标内发生的多种健康变化,而且它们忽视了个体对这些健康变化的偏好。本文讨论并批判性地评估了基于偏好的方法在围产期保健效益衡量中的应用,这些方法是从经济理论发展而来的。这些方法包括基于质量调整生命年(QALY)的方法、基于货币的方法以及离散选择实验。基于QALY的方法使用量表技术,如评级量表、标准博弈法和时间权衡法,或多属性效用度量,来衡量健康状态的与健康相关的生活质量权重。基于货币的方法包括显示偏好法,即观察个体实际做出的有关健康风险的决策,以及支付意愿法,该方法提供了一个框架来调查个体为医疗保健干预效益支付费用的意愿。离散选择实验根据医疗保健干预的属性来描述它们,并引出对结合了这些属性不同水平的情景的偏好。实证例子用于说明每种基于偏好的效益衡量方法,并讨论了将这些方法应用于围产期背景时出现的几个方法学问题。特别关注确定纳入测量工具的相关属性、测量活动的合适受访者、描述和估值过程中潜在的偏差来源,以及替代测量方法的实用性、可靠性和有效性。本文的结论是,研究人员在围产期保健背景下应用基于偏好的方法进行效益衡量时应明确且严谨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验