• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外使用不同根管封闭剂进行根管充填后粪肠球菌在感染牙本质小管中的存活情况。

Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after root canal filling with different root canal sealers in vitro.

作者信息

Saleh I M, Ruyter I E, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D

机构信息

NIOM, Scandinavian Institute of Dental Materials, Haslum, Norway.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2004 Mar;37(3):193-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00785.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00785.x
PMID:15009409
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the ability of different endodontic sealers and calcium hydroxide to kill bacteria in experimentally infected dentinal tubules.

METHODOLOGY

Fifty-six human root segments were enlarged to size 2 (ISO size 090) Largo Peeso Reamer. After treatment with 17% EDTA and 5% NaOCl for 4 min each, the specimens were infected with Enterococcus faecalis for 3 weeks. The roots were divided into eight groups and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus (AH); Grossman's sealer (GS); Ketac-Endo (KE); Apexit (AP); RoekoSeal Automix (RSA); or RoekoSeal Automix with an experimental primer (RP), or calcium hydroxide (CH) only. One group of specimens was left unfilled for control (CT). Following storage in humid conditions at 37 degrees C for 7 days, the root canals were re-established with new sterile Largo size 2. Dentine samples from each canal were then collected using a sterile size 5 (ISO size 150) Largo Peeso Reamer. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was determined for each sample.

RESULTS

The mean log10 CFU in all test groups was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that in the CT group. Root filling with AH and GS killed bacteria (mean CFU = 0) in the dentinal tubules. The mean log10 CFU for the CH group (0.53) was lower than that of RSA, AP, RP and KE (1.36, 1.40, 1.46 and 1.94, respectively), but only the difference between the CH and the KE groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Root fillings in vitro with gutta-percha and AH or GS were effective in killing E. faecalis in dentinal tubules. Other endodontic sealers, as well as CH, were less effective.

摘要

目的

研究不同根管封闭剂和氢氧化钙杀灭实验性感染牙本质小管内细菌的能力。

方法

将56个人类牙根段扩大至2号(ISO 090号)拉戈皮索扩孔钻大小。分别用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)处理4分钟后,将标本用粪肠球菌感染3周。将牙根分为八组,分别用牙胶尖和AH Plus(AH)、格罗斯曼封闭剂(GS)、Ketac-Endo(KE)、Apexit(AP)、RoekoSeal Automix(RSA)、或添加实验性底漆的RoekoSeal Automix(RP)填充,或仅用氢氧化钙(CH)填充。一组标本不做填充作为对照(CT)。在37℃潮湿条件下储存7天后,用新的无菌2号拉戈器械重新建立根管。然后用无菌5号(ISO 150号)拉戈皮索扩孔钻从每个根管收集牙本质样本。测定每个样本的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量。

结果

所有测试组的平均log10 CFU均显著低于CT组(P < 0.05)。用AH和GS进行根管充填可杀灭牙本质小管内的细菌(平均CFU = 0)。CH组的平均log10 CFU(0.53)低于RSA、AP、RP和KE组(分别为1.36、1.40、1.46和1.94),但仅CH组和KE组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

体外使用牙胶尖和AH或GS进行根管充填可有效杀灭牙本质小管内的粪肠球菌。其他根管封闭剂以及CH的效果较差。

相似文献

1
Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after root canal filling with different root canal sealers in vitro.体外使用不同根管封闭剂进行根管充填后粪肠球菌在感染牙本质小管中的存活情况。
Int Endod J. 2004 Mar;37(3):193-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00785.x.
2
Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.牙本质可增强根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
3
Antibacterial activity of various root canal sealers and root-end filling materials in dentin blocks infected ex vivo with Enterococcus faecalis.粪肠球菌体外感染牙本质块中各种根管封闭剂和根尖充填材料的抗菌活性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Nov;72(8):970-6. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.931462. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
4
The effects of dentine pretreatment on the adhesion of root-canal sealers.牙本质预处理对根管封闭剂黏附的影响。
Int Endod J. 2002 Oct;35(10):859-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00585.x.
5
Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的短期抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jul;38(7):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x.
6
Adhesion of endodontic sealers: scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy.根管封闭剂的黏附:扫描电子显微镜和能谱分析
J Endod. 2003 Sep;29(9):595-601. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200309000-00013.
7
Bacterial killing by several root filling materials and methods in an ex vivo infected root canal model.几种根管填充材料和方法在离体感染根管模型中的杀菌效果。
Int Endod J. 2011 Dec;44(12):1102-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01928.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
8
Antibacterial Efficacy of Pastes Against E Faecalis in Primary Root Dentin: A Confocal Microscope Study.糊剂对原发性牙根牙本质中粪肠球菌的抗菌效果:一项共聚焦显微镜研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Spring;39(3):247-54. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.3.247.
9
Recovery of Enterococcus faecalis after single- or multiple-visit root canal treatments carried out in infected teeth ex vivo.在体外对感染牙齿进行单次或多次根管治疗后粪肠球菌的恢复情况。
Int Endod J. 2005 Oct;38(10):697-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00992.x.
10
The antimicrobial effect within dentinal tubules of four root canal sealers.四种根管封闭剂在牙本质小管内的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 1996 May;22(5):257-9. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80144-5.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Endoseal MTA and AH Plus Sealers on and Mature Biofilms.Endoseal MTA和AH Plus封闭剂对早期和成熟生物膜的体外抗菌作用
Front Dent. 2025 May 19;22:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i19.18760. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative analysis of dentinal tubule penetration: effects of irrigation activation methods and root canal sealers: in-vitro study.牙本质小管渗透的比较分析:冲洗激活方法和根管封闭剂的影响:体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):991. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06419-y.
3
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Nd:YAG Laser in Polymicrobial Root Canal Infections: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.
钕钇铝石榴石激光对多菌性根管感染的抗菌效果:体外研究的系统评价
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 12;26(12):5631. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125631.
4
In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.根管治疗后使用AH plus、Endoseal MTA和冷陶瓷封闭剂时粪肠球菌在牙本质小管内存活情况的体外比较
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1488. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8.
5
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.牙髓封闭剂和粘固剂的生物学特性与溶解性
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024.
6
Antibacterial activity of root canal sealers against established monospecies biofilm: An study.根管封闭剂对已形成的单一菌种生物膜的抗菌活性:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Sep-Oct;26(5):569-573. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_37_23. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
7
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of an Epoxy Resin-Based Endodontic Sealer Containing Nanoparticles Amorphous Calcium Phosphate.含纳米无定形磷酸钙的环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的抗菌活性及细胞毒性评价
Int J Dent. 2023 Dec 5;2023:8717655. doi: 10.1155/2023/8717655. eCollection 2023.
8
Antimicrobial FiteBac® K21 promotes antimicrobial Potency and wound healing.抗菌产品FiteBac® K21可增强抗菌效力并促进伤口愈合。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 19;9(8):e19282. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19282. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide, Chlorhexidine, and Triple Antibiotic Paste in Different Combination Forms as Intracanal Medicaments against in Primary Teeth: An Randomized Clinical Trial.氢氧化钙、氯己定和三联抗生素糊剂不同组合形式作为乳牙根管内药物的抗菌效果比较评价:一项随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):448-452. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2599.
10
Biocompatibility analysis in subcutaneous tissue and physico-chemical analysis of pre-mixed calcium silicate-based sealers.皮下组织的生物相容性分析及预先混合的硅酸钙基封固剂的物理化学分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2221-2234. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04957-9. Epub 2023 Mar 28.