• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的短期抗菌活性。

Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis.

作者信息

Kayaoglu G, Erten H, Alaçam T, Ørstavik D

机构信息

Department of Endodontics and Conservative Treatment, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2005 Jul;38(7):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x
PMID:15946270
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the antimicrobial activity of root canal sealers on Enterococcus faecalis, either allowing or avoiding direct contact between sealers and bacteria.

METHODOLOGY

Filter paper discs were immersed in standardized E. faecalis suspensions and exposed to freshly mixed sealers (MCS, AH Plus, Grossman's sealer, Sealapex, Apexit) in teflon wells for 30 min, with or without a filter membrane placed between filter paper discs and sealers (membrane-restricted contact test and direct contact test, respectively). After exposure, the filter paper discs were transferred to vials containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and glass beads, and vigorously vortexed. PBS with resuspended bacterial cells was serially diluted and 25 microL droplets were seeded on TSA plates. The plates were incubated in air at 37 degrees C for 24 h and colony-forming units were counted. Using alpha = 0.05 as level for statistical significance, the data obtained were analysed using Student's t-test.

RESULTS

In the direct contact test, MCS and AH Plus killed the bacteria to a level below the detection limit. They were followed in decreasing order of efficacy by Grossman's sealer, Sealapex and Apexit. In the membrane-restricted contact test, the sealers ranked: MCS, AH Plus, Grossman's sealer, Apexit and Sealapex, in descending order of antibacterial potency. MCS, AH Plus and Grossman's sealer significantly reduced the number of viable bacteria in both tests. Sealapex and Apexit were not statistically different from control.

CONCLUSIONS

MCS, AH Plus and Grossman's sealer were effective in reducing the number of cultivable cells of E. faecalis. Calcium hydroxide-based sealers, Sealapex and Apexit were ineffective in this short-term experiment.

摘要

目的

研究根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性,包括允许或避免封闭剂与细菌直接接触的情况。

方法

将滤纸圆盘浸入标准化的粪肠球菌悬液中,然后在聚四氟乙烯孔中与新鲜混合的封闭剂(MCS、AH Plus、格罗斯曼封闭剂、Sealapex、Apexit)接触30分钟,分别进行有或没有在滤纸圆盘和封闭剂之间放置滤膜的操作(分别为膜限制接触试验和直接接触试验)。接触后,将滤纸圆盘转移到含有磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)和玻璃珠的小瓶中,并剧烈涡旋。将含有重悬细菌细胞的PBS进行系列稀释,取25微升液滴接种于TSA平板上。平板在37℃空气中孵育24小时,然后计数菌落形成单位。以α = 0.05作为统计学显著性水平,使用学生t检验分析所得数据。

结果

在直接接触试验中,MCS和AH Plus将细菌杀灭至检测限以下水平。其次是格罗斯曼封闭剂、Sealapex和Apexit,按疗效递减顺序排列。在膜限制接触试验中,封闭剂的抗菌效力排序为:MCS、AH Plus、格罗斯曼封闭剂、Apexit和Sealapex,从高到低。在两种试验中,MCS、AH Plus和格罗斯曼封闭剂均显著减少了活菌数量。Sealapex和Apexit与对照组无统计学差异。

结论

MCS、AH Plus和格罗斯曼封闭剂在减少粪肠球菌可培养细胞数量方面有效。基于氢氧化钙的封闭剂Sealapex和Apexit在该短期实验中无效。

相似文献

1
Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的短期抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jul;38(7):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x.
2
Antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2003 Apr;29(4):257-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200304000-00006.
3
A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer.三种根管封闭剂的抗菌效果和流变性比较评价
Int Endod J. 2011 Apr;44(4):307-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01829.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
4
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of nine root canal sealers: direct contact test.九种根管封闭剂抗菌活性的体外评价:直接接触试验
Odontostomatol Trop. 2008 Dec;31(124):11-8.
5
Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis.通过改良直接接触试验检测根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):1051-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.022.
6
Antibacterial activity of a new endodontic sealer against Enterococcus faecalis.一种新型根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性
J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;72(7):637.
7
In vitro pharmacodynamic activities of root canal sealers on Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的体外药效学活性
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 May 1;10(3):35-42.
8
Antimicrobial action of calcium hydroxide-based endodontic sealers after setting, against E. faecalis biofilm.氢氧化钙类根管封闭剂凝固后对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0038. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
9
Antibacterial properties of four endodontic sealers.四种根管封闭剂的抗菌性能
J Endod. 2008 Jun;34(6):735-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
10
Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.牙本质可增强根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Endoseal MTA and AH Plus Sealers on and Mature Biofilms.Endoseal MTA和AH Plus封闭剂对早期和成熟生物膜的体外抗菌作用
Front Dent. 2025 May 19;22:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i19.18760. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Analysis of Antibacterial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics of Three Root Canal Sealers.三种根管封闭剂抗菌效果及流动特性的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 4;16(9):e68659. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68659. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Negotiating and Treating Lateral Canals: Report of 7 Cases.
侧隐窝狭窄的诊治:附 7 例报告
Eur Endod J. 2024 Aug 22;9(3):287-294. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.43265.
4
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of an Epoxy Resin-Based Endodontic Sealer Containing Nanoparticles Amorphous Calcium Phosphate.含纳米无定形磷酸钙的环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的抗菌活性及细胞毒性评价
Int J Dent. 2023 Dec 5;2023:8717655. doi: 10.1155/2023/8717655. eCollection 2023.
5
Biocompatibility, Biomineralization and Induction of Collagen Maturation with the Use of Calcium Hydroxide and Iodoform Intracanal Dressing.使用氢氧化钙和碘仿根管内敷料的生物相容性、生物矿化及胶原成熟诱导作用
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Oct 10;14(10):507. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100507.
6
The Evaluation of the Antibacterial and Antifungal Efficacy of Novel Kids Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (e-MTA) With ProRoot MTA and Glass Ionomer Cement.新型儿童矿物三氧化物凝聚体(e-MTA)与ProRoot MTA及玻璃离子水门汀的抗菌和抗真菌疗效评估
Cureus. 2022 Jul 25;14(7):e27226. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27226. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Herbal Medications in Endodontics and Its Application-A Review of Literature.牙髓病学中的草药及其应用——文献综述
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 25;15(9):3111. doi: 10.3390/ma15093111.
8
Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria.EndoSeal MTA、iRoot SP和AH Plus对浮游细菌的抗菌活性评估。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;15(6):2012. doi: 10.3390/ma15062012.
9
The Short-Term Antibacterial Activity of Three Selected Endodontic Sealers against Bacterial Culture.三种选定的根管封闭剂对细菌培养物的短期抗菌活性
Life (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;12(2):158. doi: 10.3390/life12020158.
10
Smear layer removal and sealer penetration with different tapers after using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique.使用光启动光声流技术后,不同锥度下的玷污层去除和密封剂渗透。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):5025-5032. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03813-y. Epub 2021 Feb 4.