Mattu Gurdial S, Heran Balraj S, Wright James M
Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Blood Press Monit. 2004 Feb;9(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200402000-00009.
The objective of this report is to combine the data from an earlier adult study with the data from a paediatric study in order to determine the overall accuracy of the BpTRU (BPM-100 model) as compared to the recognized standard, auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
The individual blood pressure points recorded for both adult and paediatric studies were compared directly to its corresponding observer reference measurements from data collected and stored from the two separate studies. There were 255 sets of readings in the adult study and 162 sets from the paediatric study, which were combined to make 417 pairs of blood pressure readings for this study.
The overall observer standard reference mean for the 417 measurements was calculated and the difference between this and the overall mean BPM-100 was calculated with SD and ranges. Measurements within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg agreement were expressed as percentages.
A total of 121 subjects were included for this study (85 from the adult study and 36 from the paediatric study). From these, 417 paired measurements were recorded. The mean difference between the BpTRU and the reference standard systolic blood pressure (BP) was 0.47+/-5.40 mmHg with 89.2% measurements within 5 mmHg, 96.4% within 10 mmHg and 99.3% within 15 mmHg. The mean difference between the BpTRU and reference diastolic BP was -2.12+/-5.93 mmHg with 81.1% within 5 mmHg, 92.1% within 10 mmHg and 97.6% within 15 mmHg.
The BpTRU has been shown to be an accurate non-invasive blood pressure monitoring device in the general population over a wide range of ages (3-83 years). This combined study meets all requirements of the Association of Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and achieved a grade 'A' in the BHS protocol.
本报告的目的是将早期成人研究的数据与儿科研究的数据相结合,以确定与公认标准听诊式汞柱血压计相比,BpTRU(BPM - 100型号)的总体准确性。
将成人和儿科研究中记录的个体血压点直接与其从两项独立研究收集和存储的数据中的相应观察者参考测量值进行比较。成人研究中有255组读数,儿科研究中有162组读数,本研究将它们合并以形成417对血压读数。
计算417次测量的总体观察者标准参考均值,并计算其与BPM - 100总体均值之间的差异以及标准差和范围。5、10和15 mmHg范围内一致的测量值以百分比表示。
本研究共纳入121名受试者(成人研究85名,儿科研究36名)。从中记录了417对测量值。BpTRU与参考标准收缩压之间的平均差异为0.47±5.40 mmHg,5 mmHg范围内的测量值占89.2%,10 mmHg范围内的占96.4%,15 mmHg范围内的占99.3%。BpTRU与参考舒张压之间的平均差异为 - 2.12±5.93 mmHg,5 mmHg范围内的占81.1%,10 mmHg范围内的占