Suppr超能文献

蹬踏频率会影响高强度骑行过程中的耐力表现。

Pedalling rate affects endurance performance during high-intensity cycling.

作者信息

Nielsen Jens Steen, Hansen Ernst Albin, Sjøgaard Gisela

机构信息

Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jun;92(1-2):114-20. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1048-y. Epub 2004 Mar 13.

Abstract

The purpose of this study into high-intensity cycling was to: (1) test the hypothesis that endurance time is longest at a freely chosen pedalling rate (FCPR), compared to pedalling rates 25% lower (FCPR-25) and higher (FCPR+25) than FCPR, and (2) investigate how physiological variables, such as muscle fibre type composition and power reserve, relate to endurance time. Twenty males underwent testing to determine their maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)), power output corresponding to 90% of VO(2max) at 80 rpm (W90), FCPR at W90, percentage of slow twitch muscle fibres (% MHC I), maximal leg power, and endurance time at W90 with FCPR-25, FCPR, and FCPR+25. Power reserve was calculated as the difference between applied power output at a given pedalling rate and peak crank power at this same pedalling rate. W90 was 325 (47) W. FCPR at W90 was 78 (11) rpm, resulting in FCPR-25 being 59 (8) rpm and FCPR+25 being 98 (13) rpm. Endurance time at W90(FCPR+25) [441 (188) s] was significantly shorter than at W90(FCPR) [589 (232) s] and W90(FCPR-25) [547 (170) s]. Metabolic responses such as VO(2) and blood lactate concentration were generally higher at W90(FCPR+25) than at W90(FCPR-25) and W90(FCPR). Endurance time was negatively related to VO(2max), W90 and % MHC I, while positively related to power reserve. In conclusion, at group level, endurance time was longer at FCPR and at a pedalling rate 25% lower compared to a pedalling rate 25% higher than FCPR. Further, inter-individual physiological variables were of significance for endurance time, % MHC I showing a negative and power reserve a positive relationship.

摘要

这项针对高强度骑行的研究目的是

(1)检验以下假设,即与比自由选择的蹬踏频率(FCPR)低25%(FCPR - 25)和高25%(FCPR + 25)的蹬踏频率相比,耐力时间在自由选择的蹬踏频率下最长;(2)研究生理变量,如肌纤维类型组成和功率储备,如何与耐力时间相关。20名男性接受测试以确定他们的最大摄氧量(VO₂max)、在80转/分钟时相当于VO₂max的90%的功率输出(W90)、W90时的FCPR、慢肌纤维百分比(%MHC I)、最大腿部功率以及在W90时以FCPR - 25、FCPR和FCPR + 25的耐力时间。功率储备计算为给定蹬踏频率下的应用功率输出与该相同蹬踏频率下的峰值曲柄功率之间的差值。W90为325(47)瓦。W90时的FCPR为78(11)转/分钟,因此FCPR - 25为59(8)转/分钟,FCPR + 25为98(13)转/分钟。W90(FCPR + 25)时的耐力时间[441(188)秒]显著短于W90(FCPR)时的[589(232)秒]和W90(FCPR - 25)时的[547(170)秒]。诸如VO₂和血乳酸浓度等代谢反应在W90(FCPR + 25)时通常高于W90(FCPR - 25)和W90(FCPR)时。耐力时间与VO₂max、W90和%MHC I呈负相关,而与功率储备呈正相关。总之,在群体水平上,FCPR以及比FCPR低25%的蹬踏频率下的耐力时间比比FCPR高25%的蹬踏频率下更长。此外,个体间的生理变量对耐力时间具有重要意义,%MHC I显示出负相关,功率储备显示出正相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验